2008Journal of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRequires access

Management of painless mid-trimester cervical dilatation: Prophylactic vs emergency placement of cervical cerclage

Gary Ventolini, Ran Neiger

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Women with recurrent painless mid-trimester miscarriages are often diagnosed with cervical insufficiency. Presenting symptoms typically include vaginal pressure and minimal bleeding; when the cervix is examined, advanced dilatation is usually detected. Labour is short and the premature fetus is born alive. Women with this history were traditionally considered candidates for the placement of cervical cerclage. Recently, this practice has been called into question. Rather than routine placement of prophylactic cervical cerclage at 12 - 14 weeks, many patients are followed expectantly with serial sonographic assessments of cervical length. The goal of this update is to review the literature regarding management options of mid-trimester cervical dilatation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Women with recurrent painless mid-trimester miscarriages are often diagnosed with cervical insufficiency. Presenting symptoms typically include vaginal pressure and minimal bleeding; when the cervix is examined, advanced dilatation is usually detected. Labour is short and the premature fetus is born alive. Women with this history were traditionally considered candidates for the placement of cervical cerclage. Recently, this practice has been called into question. Rather than routine placement of prophylactic cervical cerclage at 12 - 14 weeks, many patients are followed expectantly with serial sonographic assessments of cervical length. The goal of this update is to review the literature regarding management options of mid-trimester cervical dilatation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Women with recurrent painless mid-trimester miscarriages are often diagnosed with cervical insufficiency. Presenting symptoms typically include vaginal pressure and minimal bleeding; when the cervix is examined, advanced dilatation is usually detected. Labour is short and the premature fetus is born alive. Women with this history were traditionally considered candidates for the placement of cervical cerclage. Recently, this practice has been called into question. Rather than routine placement of prophylactic cervical cerclage at 12 - 14 weeks, many patients are followed expectantly with serial sonographic assessments of cervical length. The goal of this update is to review the literature regarding management options of mid-trimester cervical dilatation.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cervical cerclage, Cervical dilatation, Cervical insufficiency, Cervix, Second trimester, Obstetrics, Expectant management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Management of painless mid-trimester cervical dilatation: Prophylactic vs emergency placement of cervical cerclage — Research Paper | ScholarLens