Two conceptions of autonomy
Fred D’Agostino
Abstract
Fred D’Agostino
Abstract
Classical liberal theoryhas worked with a rationalistic conception of autonomy. S/he behaves autonomously who behaves in accordance with reason. The prominence of this conception of autonomy has contributed to the exploitation, by liberal political practice, of discourses of expertise which work to heteronomize citizens' choices and actions. A pluralisticconception of autonomy is developed, based on insights of Stanley Benn, which may provide a bulwark against the exploitation of citizens by experts. Some conditions for the protection of pluralistic autonomy are identified.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Classical liberal theoryhas worked with a rationalistic conception of autonomy. S/he behaves autonomously who behaves in accordance with reason. The prominence of this conception of autonomy has contributed to the exploitation, by liberal political practice, of discourses of expertise which work to heteronomize citizens' choices and actions. A pluralisticconception of autonomy is developed, based on insights of Stanley Benn, which may provide a bulwark against the exploitation of citizens by experts. Some conditions for the protection of pluralistic autonomy are identified.
Key concepts: Autonomy, Sociology, Epistemology, Political science, Philosophy, Law