1997Journal of Analytical ToxicologyRequires access

Analytical Methods for the Determination of Urinary 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid and 2-Methyl-4-Chlorophenoxyacetic Acid in Occupationally Exposed Subjects and in the General Population

Cristina Aprea, Giulio Sciarra, Nanda Bozzi

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

Two methods for the quantitative analysis of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in urine were compared. The first was an high-performance liquid chromatography method using a C8 column with ion suppression and diode array detection. The urine extracts were first purified by solid-phase extraction (SPE) on silica capillary columns. The detection limit of the method was 15 micrograms/L for both compounds. The percentage coefficient of variation of the whole analysis evaluated at a concentration of 125.0 micrograms/L was 6.2% for 2,4-D and 6.8% for MCPA. The mean recovery of analysis was 81% for 2,4-D and 85% for MCPA. The second was a gas chromatographic (GC) method in which the compounds were first derivatized with pentafluorobenzylbromide to pentafluorobenzyl esters, which were determined with a slightly polar capillary column and electron capture detection. Before GC analysis, the urine extracts were purified by SPE on silica capillary columns. This method had a detection limit of 1 microgram/L for both compounds and a percentage coefficient of variation of the whole analysis, evaluated at a concentration of 30.0 micrograms/L, of 8% for 2,4-D, and of 5.5% for MCPA. the mean recovery was 87% for 2,4-D and 94% for MCPA. The low detection limit made the second method suitable for assaying the two herbicides in the general population. Duplicate analysis of ten urine samples from occupationally exposed subjects by the two methods gave identical results for a wide range of concentrations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two methods for the quantitative analysis of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in urine were compared. The first was an high-performance liquid chromatography method using a C8 column with ion suppression and diode array detection. The urine extracts were first purified by solid-phase extraction (SPE) on silica capillary columns. The detection limit of the method was 15 micrograms/L for both compounds. The percentage coefficient of variation of the whole analysis evaluated at a concentration of 125.0 micrograms/L was 6.2% for 2,4-D and 6.8% for MCPA. The mean recovery of analysis was 81% for 2,4-D and 85% for MCPA. The second was a gas chromatographic (GC) method in which the compounds were first derivatized with pentafluorobenzylbromide to pentafluorobenzyl esters, which were determined with a slightly polar capillary column and electron capture detection. Before GC analysis, the urine extracts were purified by SPE on silica capillary columns. This method had a detection limit of 1 microgram/L for both compounds and a percentage coefficient of variation of the whole analysis, evaluated at a concentration of 30.0 micrograms/L, of 8% for 2,4-D, and of 5.5% for MCPA. the mean recovery was 87% for 2,4-D and 94% for MCPA. The low detection limit made the second method suitable for assaying the two herbicides in the general population. Duplicate analysis of ten urine samples from occupationally exposed subjects by the two methods gave identical results for a wide range of concentrations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two methods for the quantitative analysis of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in urine were compared. The first was an high-performance liquid chromatography method using a C8 column with ion suppression and diode array detection. The urine extracts were first purified by solid-phase extraction (SPE) on silica capillary columns. The detection limit of the method was 15 micrograms/L for both compounds. The percentage coefficient of variation of the whole analysis evaluated at a concentration of 125.0 micrograms/L was 6.2% for 2,4-D and 6.8% for MCPA. The mean recovery of analysis was 81% for 2,4-D and 85% for MCPA. The second was a gas chromatographic (GC) method in which the compounds were first derivatized with pentafluorobenzylbromide to pentafluorobenzyl esters, which were determined with a slightly polar capillary column and electron capture detection. Before GC analysis, the urine extracts were purified by SPE on silica capillary columns. This method had a detection limit of 1 microgram/L for both compounds and a percentage coefficient of variation of the whole analysis, evaluated at a concentration of 30.0 micrograms/L, of 8% for 2,4-D, and of 5.5% for MCPA. the mean recovery was 87% for 2,4-D and 94% for MCPA. The low detection limit made the second method suitable for assaying the two herbicides in the general population. Duplicate analysis of ten urine samples from occupationally exposed subjects by the two methods gave identical results for a wide range of concentrations.

Key concepts: 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, Urinary system, Chromatography, Chemistry, Urine, Population, Medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analytical Methods for the Determination of Urinary 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid and 2-Methyl-4-Chlorophenoxyacetic Acid in Occupationally Exposed Subjects and in the General Population — Research Paper | ScholarLens