2009International Journal of Vehicle Noise and VibrationRequires access

A comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semi-active suspension systems based on different vehicle models

Waleed Fekry Faris, Sany Izan Ihsan, Mehdi Ahmadian

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Vehicle models used to evaluate performance and dynamic behaviour are either discrete models, which includes quarter, half, and full car models, or continuous models using finite element modelling. In this work our focus will be on discrete models, which have more popularity with ground vehicle analysts owing to their shorter computational time and lower cost compared with continuous models. In this paper, ride comfort, suspension displacement and road-holding performances are compared for three different models – quarter (Q), half (H) and full (F) car models. In each model, semi-active system controls, namely skyhook, groundhook and hybrid controls, are used along with the conventional passive system. The analysis covers both transient and steady-state responses in the time domain and transmissibility response in the frequency domain. Results show that while the responses give generally the same trend, the simpler model gives significantly higher responses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Vehicle models used to evaluate performance and dynamic behaviour are either discrete models, which includes quarter, half, and full car models, or continuous models using finite element modelling. In this work our focus will be on discrete models, which have more popularity with ground vehicle analysts owing to their shorter computational time and lower cost compared with continuous models. In this paper, ride comfort, suspension displacement and road-holding performances are compared for three different models – quarter (Q), half (H) and full (F) car models. In each model, semi-active system controls, namely skyhook, groundhook and hybrid controls, are used along with the conventional passive system. The analysis covers both transient and steady-state responses in the time domain and transmissibility response in the frequency domain. Results show that while the responses give generally the same trend, the simpler model gives significantly higher responses.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Vehicle models used to evaluate performance and dynamic behaviour are either discrete models, which includes quarter, half, and full car models, or continuous models using finite element modelling. In this work our focus will be on discrete models, which have more popularity with ground vehicle analysts owing to their shorter computational time and lower cost compared with continuous models. In this paper, ride comfort, suspension displacement and road-holding performances are compared for three different models – quarter (Q), half (H) and full (F) car models. In each model, semi-active system controls, namely skyhook, groundhook and hybrid controls, are used along with the conventional passive system. The analysis covers both transient and steady-state responses in the time domain and transmissibility response in the frequency domain. Results show that while the responses give generally the same trend, the simpler model gives significantly higher responses.

Key concepts: Skyhook, Transmissibility (structural dynamics), Suspension (topology), Frequency domain, Car model, Engineering, Time domain, Control theory (sociology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semi-active suspension systems based on different vehicle models — Research Paper | ScholarLens