2005International Journal of Vehicle DesignRequires access

Ride comfort performance of different active suspension systems

Daniel A. Mántaras, Pablo Luque

Open publisher page 50 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative of different active and semi-active suspension systems in order to research the improvement in ride comfort and handling stability compared with the equivalent passive systems. The two-degrees-of-freedom model (quarter-car model) is employed in the analysis of seven different active suspension control strategies: LQR-LQG, Robust design, Kalman filter, Skyhook damper, Pole-assignment, Neural network and Fuzzy logic. Computer simulations of the different active models and the equivalent passive systems are performed to obtain the vertical acceleration of the sprung mass and the vertical wheel load variation. The vertical acceleration of the sprung mass is processed to evaluate the ride comfort behaviour and the vertical wheel load variation is used to evaluate the handling stability of the different active suspension control systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents a comparative of different active and semi-active suspension systems in order to research the improvement in ride comfort and handling stability compared with the equivalent passive systems. The two-degrees-of-freedom model (quarter-car model) is employed in the analysis of seven different active suspension control strategies: LQR-LQG, Robust design, Kalman filter, Skyhook damper, Pole-assignment, Neural network and Fuzzy logic. Computer simulations of the different active models and the equivalent passive systems are performed to obtain the vertical acceleration of the sprung mass and the vertical wheel load variation. The vertical acceleration of the sprung mass is processed to evaluate the ride comfort behaviour and the vertical wheel load variation is used to evaluate the handling stability of the different active suspension control systems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents a comparative of different active and semi-active suspension systems in order to research the improvement in ride comfort and handling stability compared with the equivalent passive systems. The two-degrees-of-freedom model (quarter-car model) is employed in the analysis of seven different active suspension control strategies: LQR-LQG, Robust design, Kalman filter, Skyhook damper, Pole-assignment, Neural network and Fuzzy logic. Computer simulations of the different active models and the equivalent passive systems are performed to obtain the vertical acceleration of the sprung mass and the vertical wheel load variation. The vertical acceleration of the sprung mass is processed to evaluate the ride comfort behaviour and the vertical wheel load variation is used to evaluate the handling stability of the different active suspension control systems.

Key concepts: Skyhook, Sprung mass, Active suspension, Control theory (sociology), Engineering, Suspension (topology), Acceleration, Linear-quadratic-Gaussian control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ride comfort performance of different active suspension systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens