2001•Canadian Journal of Forest ResearchRequires access

Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis

Andreas Rothe, Dan Binkley

Open publisher page 327 citations

Abstract

For more than a century, scientists have considered whether mixtures of tree species may differ in nutrition and yield relative to monocultures. We review the empirical evidence on the nutritional interactions of tree species in mixtures, including information on foliar nutrition, soil nutrient supply, rates of nutrient input, and patterns of root distribution. Linear effects were most common, with mixtures intermediate in value between monocultures. In some cases, values for mixtures were lower than expected, indicating an antagonistic interaction. A few cases that included nitrogen- fixing species showed a synergistic interaction, with mixtures showing higher values than monocultures. Nutrient concentrations in foliage of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carrière) were improved in mixtures with other conifers in three studies, in contrast to four studies with mixtures of various conifers and hardwoods that showed no effect of mixtures on foliage nutrient concentrations. Mixtures that combine species with and without the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen have shown a full range of foliar responses from decreases to increases in phosphorus, to increases in nitrogen, to no effect of mixtures. Rates of litter decomposition usually showed no effect of species mixtures, but a few cases demonstrated both increases and decreases in decomposition relative to monocultures. Pools of soil nutrients generally did not differ between mixtures and monocultures. Root distributions in mixtures of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) were altered in mixtures; compared with monocultures, spruce rooted more shallowly in mixtures with beech, and beech rooted more deeply in mixtures with spruce. General conclusions are limited by the small number of studies that directly addressed mixed-species effects in forests, and the wide variety of observed interactions. Further research would be particularly helpful in identifying situations where nonlinear interactions may develop, including the species and site conditions that promote nonlinear interactions. Neighborhood methods, which analyze the relationship between stand composition and nutritional properties on a small spatial scale, offer great potential for exploring nutritional effects in mixed-species stands.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For more than a century, scientists have considered whether mixtures of tree species may differ in nutrition and yield relative to monocultures. We review the empirical evidence on the nutritional interactions of tree species in mixtures, including information on foliar nutrition, soil nutrient supply, rates of nutrient input, and patterns of root distribution. Linear effects were most common, with mixtures intermediate in value between monocultures. In some cases, values for mixtures were lower than expected, indicating an antagonistic interaction. A few cases that included nitrogen- fixing species showed a synergistic interaction, with mixtures showing higher values than monocultures. Nutrient concentrations in foliage of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carrière) were improved in mixtures with other conifers in three studies, in contrast to four studies with mixtures of various conifers and hardwoods that showed no effect of mixtures on foliage nutrient concentrations. Mixtures that combine species with and without the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen have shown a full range of foliar responses from decreases to increases in phosphorus, to increases in nitrogen, to no effect of mixtures. Rates of litter decomposition usually showed no effect of species mixtures, but a few cases demonstrated both increases and decreases in decomposition relative to monocultures. Pools of soil nutrients generally did not differ between mixtures and monocultures. Root distributions in mixtures of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) were altered in mixtures; compared with monocultures, spruce rooted more shallowly in mixtures with beech, and beech rooted more deeply in mixtures with spruce. General conclusions are limited by the small number of studies that directly addressed mixed-species effects in forests, and the wide variety of observed interactions. Further research would be particularly helpful in identifying situations where nonlinear interactions may develop, including the species and site conditions that promote nonlinear interactions. Neighborhood methods, which analyze the relationship between stand composition and nutritional properties on a small spatial scale, offer great potential for exploring nutritional effects in mixed-species stands.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 327 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For more than a century, scientists have considered whether mixtures of tree species may differ in nutrition and yield relative to monocultures. We review the empirical evidence on the nutritional interactions of tree species in mixtures, including information on foliar nutrition, soil nutrient supply, rates of nutrient input, and patterns of root distribution. Linear effects were most common, with mixtures intermediate in value between monocultures. In some cases, values for mixtures were lower than expected, indicating an antagonistic interaction. A few cases that included nitrogen- fixing species showed a synergistic interaction, with mixtures showing higher values than monocultures. Nutrient concentrations in foliage of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carrière) were improved in mixtures with other conifers in three studies, in contrast to four studies with mixtures of various conifers and hardwoods that showed no effect of mixtures on foliage nutrient concentrations. Mixtures that combine species with and without the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen have shown a full range of foliar responses from decreases to increases in phosphorus, to increases in nitrogen, to no effect of mixtures. Rates of litter decomposition usually showed no effect of species mixtures, but a few cases demonstrated both increases and decreases in decomposition relative to monocultures. Pools of soil nutrients generally did not differ between mixtures and monocultures. Root distributions in mixtures of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) were altered in mixtures; compared with monocultures, spruce rooted more shallowly in mixtures with beech, and beech rooted more deeply in mixtures with spruce. General conclusions are limited by the small number of studies that directly addressed mixed-species effects in forests, and the wide variety of observed interactions. Further research would be particularly helpful in identifying situations where nonlinear interactions may develop, including the species and site conditions that promote nonlinear interactions. Neighborhood methods, which analyze the relationship between stand composition and nutritional properties on a small spatial scale, offer great potential for exploring nutritional effects in mixed-species stands.

Key concepts: Beech, Monoculture, Picea abies, Fagus sylvatica, Nutrient, Litter, Agronomy, Botany

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis — Research Paper | ScholarLens