1987Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesRequires access

Picoplankton and Nanoplankton Biomass in Lake Ontario: Relative Contribution of Phototrophic and Heterotrophic Communities

Frances R. Pick, David A. Caron

Open publisher page 117 citations

Abstract

The seasonal and vertical abundance of phototrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton (2–20 μm) and picoplankton (0.2–2 μm) was estimated in Lake Ontario during 1982 by epifluorescence microscopy. Phototrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton abundance differed by less than an order of magnitude and was typically present at densities of 103 cells∙mL−1. Heterotrophic nanoplankton was, on average, only half as abundant as phototrophic nanoplankton, but on several dates was more abundant than the latter. Both populations peaked in late June to early July. Phototrophic picoplankton, primarily chroococcoid cyanobacteria, increased rapidly during midsummer, reaching a maximum epilimnetic concentration of 4 × 105 cells∙mL−1 in late August. Heterotrophic picoplankton (bacteria) showed a similar seasonal pattern, reaching maximum abundance in September (6 × 106) cells∙mL−1). The concentrations of both picoplankton populations were significantly correlated with temperature. By late summer, picoplankton biomass represented 74% and pico-cyanobacteria alone 50% of the total weight biomass of microorganisms < 20 μm; these populations are generally missed by inverted microscope techniques.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The seasonal and vertical abundance of phototrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton (2–20 μm) and picoplankton (0.2–2 μm) was estimated in Lake Ontario during 1982 by epifluorescence microscopy. Phototrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton abundance differed by less than an order of magnitude and was typically present at densities of 103 cells∙mL−1. Heterotrophic nanoplankton was, on average, only half as abundant as phototrophic nanoplankton, but on several dates was more abundant than the latter. Both populations peaked in late June to early July. Phototrophic picoplankton, primarily chroococcoid cyanobacteria, increased rapidly during midsummer, reaching a maximum epilimnetic concentration of 4 × 105 cells∙mL−1 in late August. Heterotrophic picoplankton (bacteria) showed a similar seasonal pattern, reaching maximum abundance in September (6 × 106) cells∙mL−1). The concentrations of both picoplankton populations were significantly correlated with temperature. By late summer, picoplankton biomass represented 74% and pico-cyanobacteria alone 50% of the total weight biomass of microorganisms < 20 μm; these populations are generally missed by inverted microscope techniques.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 117 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The seasonal and vertical abundance of phototrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton (2–20 μm) and picoplankton (0.2–2 μm) was estimated in Lake Ontario during 1982 by epifluorescence microscopy. Phototrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton abundance differed by less than an order of magnitude and was typically present at densities of 103 cells∙mL−1. Heterotrophic nanoplankton was, on average, only half as abundant as phototrophic nanoplankton, but on several dates was more abundant than the latter. Both populations peaked in late June to early July. Phototrophic picoplankton, primarily chroococcoid cyanobacteria, increased rapidly during midsummer, reaching a maximum epilimnetic concentration of 4 × 105 cells∙mL−1 in late August. Heterotrophic picoplankton (bacteria) showed a similar seasonal pattern, reaching maximum abundance in September (6 × 106) cells∙mL−1). The concentrations of both picoplankton populations were significantly correlated with temperature. By late summer, picoplankton biomass represented 74% and pico-cyanobacteria alone 50% of the total weight biomass of microorganisms < 20 μm; these populations are generally missed by inverted microscope techniques.

Key concepts: Picoplankton, Phototroph, Cyanobacteria, Heterotroph, Biology, Plankton, Biomass (ecology), Abundance (ecology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Picoplankton and Nanoplankton Biomass in Lake Ontario: Relative Contribution of Phototrophic and Heterotrophic Communities — Research Paper | ScholarLens