1998Journal of Freshwater EcologyOpen access

Picoplankton Counts Greatly Alter Phytoplankton Quantitative Analyses Results

E.W. Wilde, William R. Cody

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

The methodology used for microscopically examining and enumerating phytoplankton has a major influence on the results obtained. This study describes how counting or not counting picoplankton (cells less than 2 μm) makes a large difference in terms of total abundance and taxonomic composition estimates. We suggest that the type of methodology including the smallest level of detection attempted in terms of size (e.g. macroplankton, net plankton, nannoplankton or picoplankton), should be reported for all phytoplankton studies where organisms are counted. It is also important to restrict data comparisons to studies where the same level of detection is used.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The methodology used for microscopically examining and enumerating phytoplankton has a major influence on the results obtained. This study describes how counting or not counting picoplankton (cells less than 2 μm) makes a large difference in terms of total abundance and taxonomic composition estimates. We suggest that the type of methodology including the smallest level of detection attempted in terms of size (e.g. macroplankton, net plankton, nannoplankton or picoplankton), should be reported for all phytoplankton studies where organisms are counted. It is also important to restrict data comparisons to studies where the same level of detection is used.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The methodology used for microscopically examining and enumerating phytoplankton has a major influence on the results obtained. This study describes how counting or not counting picoplankton (cells less than 2 μm) makes a large difference in terms of total abundance and taxonomic composition estimates. We suggest that the type of methodology including the smallest level of detection attempted in terms of size (e.g. macroplankton, net plankton, nannoplankton or picoplankton), should be reported for all phytoplankton studies where organisms are counted. It is also important to restrict data comparisons to studies where the same level of detection is used.

Key concepts: Picoplankton, Phytoplankton, Abundance (ecology), Plankton, Biology, Ecology, Environmental science, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Picoplankton Counts Greatly Alter Phytoplankton Quantitative Analyses Results — Research Paper | ScholarLens