2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Asynchronous design and the pursuit of low power

B. Athas

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Summary form only give, as follows. Two often cited arguments for the inherent low-power benefit of asynchronous or self-timed design is that the clock signals cause unnecessary switching activity and that the clock signals themselves dissipate a large portion of the total chip power. However, the careful and explicit application of conditional clocking and the use of novel clock driver circuits in synchronous designs rival the asynchronous approaches without incurring the typical circuitry overhead of asynchronous design. There are still though some avenues to pursue in exploiting the low-power advantages of asynchronous and self-timed circuit concepts. One promising avenue is the use of self-timed postcharged logic, sometimes called self-resetting logic, which has proven to be highly effective in RAM design and could possibly extend to other kinds of computing structures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary form only give, as follows. Two often cited arguments for the inherent low-power benefit of asynchronous or self-timed design is that the clock signals cause unnecessary switching activity and that the clock signals themselves dissipate a large portion of the total chip power. However, the careful and explicit application of conditional clocking and the use of novel clock driver circuits in synchronous designs rival the asynchronous approaches without incurring the typical circuitry overhead of asynchronous design. There are still though some avenues to pursue in exploiting the low-power advantages of asynchronous and self-timed circuit concepts. One promising avenue is the use of self-timed postcharged logic, sometimes called self-resetting logic, which has proven to be highly effective in RAM design and could possibly extend to other kinds of computing structures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary form only give, as follows. Two often cited arguments for the inherent low-power benefit of asynchronous or self-timed design is that the clock signals cause unnecessary switching activity and that the clock signals themselves dissipate a large portion of the total chip power. However, the careful and explicit application of conditional clocking and the use of novel clock driver circuits in synchronous designs rival the asynchronous approaches without incurring the typical circuitry overhead of asynchronous design. There are still though some avenues to pursue in exploiting the low-power advantages of asynchronous and self-timed circuit concepts. One promising avenue is the use of self-timed postcharged logic, sometimes called self-resetting logic, which has proven to be highly effective in RAM design and could possibly extend to other kinds of computing structures.

Key concepts: Asynchronous communication, Asynchronous circuit, Computer science, Asynchronous system, Overhead (engineering), Clock signal, Logic synthesis, Static timing analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Asynchronous design and the pursuit of low power — Research Paper | ScholarLens