1992Contact DermatitisRequires access

A comparative study of formaldehyde detection using chromotropic acid, acetylacetone and HPLC in cosmetics and household cleaning products

M. Gryllaki‐Berger, CH. Mugny, D. Perrenoud, A. Pannather, E. Frenk

Open publisher page 48 citations

Abstract

Chromotropic acid and acetylacetone methods for qualitative determination of formaldehyde were tested in parallel on 48 commercial samples, with high-performance liquid chromotography (HPLC) implemented for quantitative measure. In addition, interference with the detection of formaldehyde was investigated by analyzing 12 other aldehydes and ketones, 7 essential oils and 3 polysorbates. Throughout this comparative study, the disadvantages of the chromotropic acid method, of which 2 variants were used, were delineated and we found that the acetylacetone test proved to be a more efficient screening method for formaldehyde detection in a clinical laboratory.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Chromotropic acid and acetylacetone methods for qualitative determination of formaldehyde were tested in parallel on 48 commercial samples, with high-performance liquid chromotography (HPLC) implemented for quantitative measure. In addition, interference with the detection of formaldehyde was investigated by analyzing 12 other aldehydes and ketones, 7 essential oils and 3 polysorbates. Throughout this comparative study, the disadvantages of the chromotropic acid method, of which 2 variants were used, were delineated and we found that the acetylacetone test proved to be a more efficient screening method for formaldehyde detection in a clinical laboratory.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Chromotropic acid and acetylacetone methods for qualitative determination of formaldehyde were tested in parallel on 48 commercial samples, with high-performance liquid chromotography (HPLC) implemented for quantitative measure. In addition, interference with the detection of formaldehyde was investigated by analyzing 12 other aldehydes and ketones, 7 essential oils and 3 polysorbates. Throughout this comparative study, the disadvantages of the chromotropic acid method, of which 2 variants were used, were delineated and we found that the acetylacetone test proved to be a more efficient screening method for formaldehyde detection in a clinical laboratory.

Key concepts: Chromotropic acid, Acetylacetone, Formaldehyde, Chemistry, Chromatography, High-performance liquid chromatography, Cosmetics, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of formaldehyde detection using chromotropic acid, acetylacetone and HPLC in cosmetics and household cleaning products — Research Paper | ScholarLens