The Future of the ESDP in the Framework of Territorial Cohesion
U. Janin Rivolin
Abstract
U. Janin Rivolin
Abstract
The message of this contribution is that now that the EU territorial cohesion policy has been formally recognized in the European Constitutional Treaty, the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) should evolve towards a discussion of common principles of EU territorial governance. The spatial vision that the ESDP represents appears to be no longer sufficient for European Community members to get a handle on the territorial cohesion policy. Indeed, the Community Strategic Guidelines on Cohesion (CSGC) proposed in the new Structural Funds regulations might incorporate such a task in future. Moreover, the experiences of European spatial planning, summed up here in four main regional perspectives, show that some common principles of EU territorial governance would be rather in the interest of not only Community institutions, but of all public authorities in Europe, who, whether they appreciate it or not, already participate in territorial cohesion policy and are progressively transformed by it.
OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The message of this contribution is that now that the EU territorial cohesion policy has been formally recognized in the European Constitutional Treaty, the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) should evolve towards a discussion of common principles of EU territorial governance. The spatial vision that the ESDP represents appears to be no longer sufficient for European Community members to get a handle on the territorial cohesion policy. Indeed, the Community Strategic Guidelines on Cohesion (CSGC) proposed in the new Structural Funds regulations might incorporate such a task in future. Moreover, the experiences of European spatial planning, summed up here in four main regional perspectives, show that some common principles of EU territorial governance would be rather in the interest of not only Community institutions, but of all public authorities in Europe, who, whether they appreciate it or not, already participate in territorial cohesion policy and are progressively transformed by it.
Key concepts: Cohesion (chemistry), Political science, Spatial planning, Corporate governance, Community cohesion, Treaty, Public administration, Political economy