2004Vox SanguinisOpen access

Intravenous immunoglobulin and autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura: 22 years on

Philippe Bierling, Bertrand Godeau

Open full text 38 citations

Abstract

Autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura is now commonly treated with high doses of intravenous immunoglobulins. Twenty-two years after this treatment was first shown to be effective, several questions remain. We review here current knowledge concerning the frequency and type of side-effects and the probable mechanism of action of intravenous immunoglobulins. We suggest that the currently recommended dose of intravenous immunoglobulins (2 g/kg body weight) could be halved, that the total dose of intravenous immunoglobulins should be administered as a single infusion, that non-responders could be given another equal dose on day 3, and that intravenous immunoglobulins plus prednisolone should be considered as the gold standard for treatment of the most severe forms of the disease. Finally, as intravenous immunoglobulins have only a transient effect, they cannot be considered as a curative treatment for patients with chronic autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura is now commonly treated with high doses of intravenous immunoglobulins. Twenty-two years after this treatment was first shown to be effective, several questions remain. We review here current knowledge concerning the frequency and type of side-effects and the probable mechanism of action of intravenous immunoglobulins. We suggest that the currently recommended dose of intravenous immunoglobulins (2 g/kg body weight) could be halved, that the total dose of intravenous immunoglobulins should be administered as a single infusion, that non-responders could be given another equal dose on day 3, and that intravenous immunoglobulins plus prednisolone should be considered as the gold standard for treatment of the most severe forms of the disease. Finally, as intravenous immunoglobulins have only a transient effect, they cannot be considered as a curative treatment for patients with chronic autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura is now commonly treated with high doses of intravenous immunoglobulins. Twenty-two years after this treatment was first shown to be effective, several questions remain. We review here current knowledge concerning the frequency and type of side-effects and the probable mechanism of action of intravenous immunoglobulins. We suggest that the currently recommended dose of intravenous immunoglobulins (2 g/kg body weight) could be halved, that the total dose of intravenous immunoglobulins should be administered as a single infusion, that non-responders could be given another equal dose on day 3, and that intravenous immunoglobulins plus prednisolone should be considered as the gold standard for treatment of the most severe forms of the disease. Finally, as intravenous immunoglobulins have only a transient effect, they cannot be considered as a curative treatment for patients with chronic autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura.

Key concepts: Medicine, Intravenous Immunoglobulins, Antibody, Thrombocytopenic purpura, Prednisolone, Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy, Immunology, Autoimmune disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intravenous immunoglobulin and autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura: 22 years on — Research Paper | ScholarLens