1991PubMedRequires access

[Intravenous substitution with immunoglobulins].

Zielinski Cc, Eibl Mm

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

A survey of clinical data shows that substitution with intravenous immunoglobulins constitutes an essential further step in the therapy of patients with immunodeficiencies: patients with primary and some secondary immunodeficiencies clearly benefit from intravenous immunoglobulin substitution. Some other diseases including idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and the Kawasaki syndrome also constitute indications for this kind of treatment. In other cases (infections in newborn preterm infants, children with AIDS, chronic inflammatory demyelinizing polyneuropathies and the Guillain-Barré syndrome and children with refractory seizures) there are reasons to believe that intravenous immunoglobulin therapy can be of benefit, although bigger controlled studies are still necessary to allow definitive conclusions to be reached. Further attempts will have to be made to improve understanding of the mode of action of intravenously administered immunoglobulin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A survey of clinical data shows that substitution with intravenous immunoglobulins constitutes an essential further step in the therapy of patients with immunodeficiencies: patients with primary and some secondary immunodeficiencies clearly benefit from intravenous immunoglobulin substitution. Some other diseases including idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and the Kawasaki syndrome also constitute indications for this kind of treatment. In other cases (infections in newborn preterm infants, children with AIDS, chronic inflammatory demyelinizing polyneuropathies and the Guillain-Barré syndrome and children with refractory seizures) there are reasons to believe that intravenous immunoglobulin therapy can be of benefit, although bigger controlled studies are still necessary to allow definitive conclusions to be reached. Further attempts will have to be made to improve understanding of the mode of action of intravenously administered immunoglobulin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A survey of clinical data shows that substitution with intravenous immunoglobulins constitutes an essential further step in the therapy of patients with immunodeficiencies: patients with primary and some secondary immunodeficiencies clearly benefit from intravenous immunoglobulin substitution. Some other diseases including idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and the Kawasaki syndrome also constitute indications for this kind of treatment. In other cases (infections in newborn preterm infants, children with AIDS, chronic inflammatory demyelinizing polyneuropathies and the Guillain-Barré syndrome and children with refractory seizures) there are reasons to believe that intravenous immunoglobulin therapy can be of benefit, although bigger controlled studies are still necessary to allow definitive conclusions to be reached. Further attempts will have to be made to improve understanding of the mode of action of intravenously administered immunoglobulin.

Key concepts: Medicine, Intravenous Immunoglobulins, Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy, Antibody, Refractory (planetary science), Guillain-Barre syndrome, Immunology, Thrombocytopenic purpura

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Intravenous substitution with immunoglobulins]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens