2012The Internet Journal of Orthopedic SurgeryRequires access

Cost Benefit Analysis Of Suture-Button Versus Screw Fixation Of The Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis.

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to discuss and evaluate the cost effective use of the suture-button device as an alternative to screw fixation for the use of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis for the purpose of anatomical reduction of posttraumatic disruption in association with ankle fractures. While the medical consumables remain more expensive per unit cost, the relative cost savings to the organisation through a combination of length of stay, procedural cost, and the risk of operative and post operative complications, provides strong evidence that the suture-button technique, if adopted, may result in significant savings to the health care providers while at the same time not increasing the risk profile to the patient- that is, provided that the organisation’s practice is to remove the Diastasis Screw fixation prior to mobilisation. -

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of the paper is to discuss and evaluate the cost effective use of the suture-button device as an alternative to screw fixation for the use of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis for the purpose of anatomical reduction of posttraumatic disruption in association with ankle fractures. While the medical consumables remain more expensive per unit cost, the relative cost savings to the organisation through a combination of length of stay, procedural cost, and the risk of operative and post operative complications, provides strong evidence that the suture-button technique, if adopted, may result in significant savings to the health care providers while at the same time not increasing the risk profile to the patient- that is, provided that the organisation’s practice is to remove the Diastasis Screw fixation prior to mobilisation. -

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of the paper is to discuss and evaluate the cost effective use of the suture-button device as an alternative to screw fixation for the use of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis for the purpose of anatomical reduction of posttraumatic disruption in association with ankle fractures. While the medical consumables remain more expensive per unit cost, the relative cost savings to the organisation through a combination of length of stay, procedural cost, and the risk of operative and post operative complications, provides strong evidence that the suture-button technique, if adopted, may result in significant savings to the health care providers while at the same time not increasing the risk profile to the patient- that is, provided that the organisation’s practice is to remove the Diastasis Screw fixation prior to mobilisation. -

Key concepts: Syndesmosis, Medicine, Fixation (population genetics), Barbed suture, Fibrous joint, Surgery, Orthodontics, Tibia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost Benefit Analysis Of Suture-Button Versus Screw Fixation Of The Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens