2011Journal of Reconstructive MicrosurgeryRequires access

Evaluating the Use of a Barbed Suture for Skin Closure during Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Shareef Jandali, Jonas A. Nelson, Meredith R. Bergey, Seema S. Sonnad, Joseph M. Serletti

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

This study compared the use of barbed suture to a traditional skin closure method for incision closure in free flap breast reconstruction. A retrospective study compared the two closure methods in consecutive series of patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction between January 2007 and January 2009. Outcomes included total duration of operation and wound complications. We also performed a cost analysis. Use of the barbed suture significantly decreased operative time for unilateral cases by an average of 45 minutes (405 versus 360 minutes, P = 0.02). For bilateral cases, the mean operative time was decreased by an average of 10 minutes (510 versus 500 minutes, P = 0.44). There were more episodes of delayed wound healing in the bilateral barbed suture group (33/46 [72%] versus 15/31 [48%], P = 0.04). No statistical difference was noted between the two groups with regard to dehiscence, infection, or suture extrusion. Use of the barbed suture was, however, more cost-effective. The use of a barbed suture in the closure of abdominal and breast incisions in free flap breast reconstruction may expedite wound closure and reduce the cost of the procedure but may increase wound complications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study compared the use of barbed suture to a traditional skin closure method for incision closure in free flap breast reconstruction. A retrospective study compared the two closure methods in consecutive series of patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction between January 2007 and January 2009. Outcomes included total duration of operation and wound complications. We also performed a cost analysis. Use of the barbed suture significantly decreased operative time for unilateral cases by an average of 45 minutes (405 versus 360 minutes, P = 0.02). For bilateral cases, the mean operative time was decreased by an average of 10 minutes (510 versus 500 minutes, P = 0.44). There were more episodes of delayed wound healing in the bilateral barbed suture group (33/46 [72%] versus 15/31 [48%], P = 0.04). No statistical difference was noted between the two groups with regard to dehiscence, infection, or suture extrusion. Use of the barbed suture was, however, more cost-effective. The use of a barbed suture in the closure of abdominal and breast incisions in free flap breast reconstruction may expedite wound closure and reduce the cost of the procedure but may increase wound complications.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study compared the use of barbed suture to a traditional skin closure method for incision closure in free flap breast reconstruction. A retrospective study compared the two closure methods in consecutive series of patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction between January 2007 and January 2009. Outcomes included total duration of operation and wound complications. We also performed a cost analysis. Use of the barbed suture significantly decreased operative time for unilateral cases by an average of 45 minutes (405 versus 360 minutes, P = 0.02). For bilateral cases, the mean operative time was decreased by an average of 10 minutes (510 versus 500 minutes, P = 0.44). There were more episodes of delayed wound healing in the bilateral barbed suture group (33/46 [72%] versus 15/31 [48%], P = 0.04). No statistical difference was noted between the two groups with regard to dehiscence, infection, or suture extrusion. Use of the barbed suture was, however, more cost-effective. The use of a barbed suture in the closure of abdominal and breast incisions in free flap breast reconstruction may expedite wound closure and reduce the cost of the procedure but may increase wound complications.

Key concepts: Medicine, Barbed suture, Surgery, Closure (psychology), Fibrous joint, Breast reconstruction, Wound closure, Breast cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating the Use of a Barbed Suture for Skin Closure during Autologous Breast Reconstruction — Research Paper | ScholarLens