2013The Journal of Indian Orthodontic SocietyRequires access

Comparison of Transverse Dimension in Various Malocclusion Groups: A Posteroanterior Cephalometric Study

Radha Katiyar, Pradeep Tandon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: The aim of present study was to evaluate and compare the transverse dimensions in normal occlusion and various malocclusion groups. Materials and methods: This study was conducted on 90 posteroanterior cephalograms of North Indians subjects having age ranged between 18 to 28 years with a mean age of 20.2 years. The subjects were divided into three groups, Group I (Control group), Group II (Class II division 1 malocclusion), Group III (Class III malocclusion). Total 17 cephalometric parameters were used in this study in which 11 were transverse and four were vertical linear measurements, other two were difference between maxillary and mandibular width, and ratio of maxillary to mandibular width. Results: Maxillary width were found to be significantly lower in Groups II and III malocclusion (p < 0.001) than the control group. While mandibular width were found decreased significantly in Group II malocclusion and increased significantly in Group III malocclusion (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Maxillary arches were observed transversely shorter in both Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class III malocclusion in both skeletal as well as dentoalveolar width. Maxilla was found narrower 3.5 mm in Angle’s Class II division 1 malocclusion and 4.00 mm in Angle’s Class III malocclusion as comparison to normal occlusion. Finding of this study also suggest that in malocclusion only jaw bones are affected and other facial bone remains unaffected.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: The aim of present study was to evaluate and compare the transverse dimensions in normal occlusion and various malocclusion groups. Materials and methods: This study was conducted on 90 posteroanterior cephalograms of North Indians subjects having age ranged between 18 to 28 years with a mean age of 20.2 years. The subjects were divided into three groups, Group I (Control group), Group II (Class II division 1 malocclusion), Group III (Class III malocclusion). Total 17 cephalometric parameters were used in this study in which 11 were transverse and four were vertical linear measurements, other two were difference between maxillary and mandibular width, and ratio of maxillary to mandibular width. Results: Maxillary width were found to be significantly lower in Groups II and III malocclusion (p < 0.001) than the control group. While mandibular width were found decreased significantly in Group II malocclusion and increased significantly in Group III malocclusion (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Maxillary arches were observed transversely shorter in both Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class III malocclusion in both skeletal as well as dentoalveolar width. Maxilla was found narrower 3.5 mm in Angle’s Class II division 1 malocclusion and 4.00 mm in Angle’s Class III malocclusion as comparison to normal occlusion. Finding of this study also suggest that in malocclusion only jaw bones are affected and other facial bone remains unaffected.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: The aim of present study was to evaluate and compare the transverse dimensions in normal occlusion and various malocclusion groups. Materials and methods: This study was conducted on 90 posteroanterior cephalograms of North Indians subjects having age ranged between 18 to 28 years with a mean age of 20.2 years. The subjects were divided into three groups, Group I (Control group), Group II (Class II division 1 malocclusion), Group III (Class III malocclusion). Total 17 cephalometric parameters were used in this study in which 11 were transverse and four were vertical linear measurements, other two were difference between maxillary and mandibular width, and ratio of maxillary to mandibular width. Results: Maxillary width were found to be significantly lower in Groups II and III malocclusion (p < 0.001) than the control group. While mandibular width were found decreased significantly in Group II malocclusion and increased significantly in Group III malocclusion (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Maxillary arches were observed transversely shorter in both Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class III malocclusion in both skeletal as well as dentoalveolar width. Maxilla was found narrower 3.5 mm in Angle’s Class II division 1 malocclusion and 4.00 mm in Angle’s Class III malocclusion as comparison to normal occlusion. Finding of this study also suggest that in malocclusion only jaw bones are affected and other facial bone remains unaffected.

Key concepts: Orthodontics, Transverse plane, Malocclusion, Dimension (graph theory), Dentistry, Mathematics, Medicine, Combinatorics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Transverse Dimension in Various Malocclusion Groups: A Posteroanterior Cephalometric Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens