2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Shallow water multibeam sonar performance, results from a modern hydrographic survey system

Joyce Miller, Janice Ferguson, J.S. Byrne

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

SAIC conducted hydrographic surveys in April through September, 1995, in support of the first multibeam and side-scan work done under contract for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Nautical Charting Branch Office of Coast Survey. These surveys were run using SAIC's Integrated Hydrographic Survey System (IHSS) in conjunction with a Reson SeaBat multibeam sonar and a Klein side-scan sonar. The surveys were done in Long Island Sound and Martha's Vineyard in water depths of 5.5 to 60 m. Contract requirements include proof of 100 per cent multibeam coverage and 200 per cent side-scan coverage; data meeting International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) standards (1/spl times/IHO) to a swath width of 45/spl deg/ and twice MO standard (2/spl times/IHO) at greater usable widths; no across-track multibeam footprints of greater than 3 m; no multibeam gaps of greater than 3 m/spl times/3 m; and the ability to detect contacts of 1m/sup 3/ in water depths less than 20 m, 2 m on each side in 20-30 m depths, and those with heights of 1% of water depth in greater than 30 m of water. This paper discusses selection, configuration, and calibration of the multibeam sonar, related sensors, and the IHSS in order to meet the exacting MO and NOAA standards. In order to use a multibeam sonar for modern hydrographic surveys, a number of issues (including multibeam accuracy, coverage, application of correctors, data volume and throughput, and contact identification) must be addressed. The real-time and processing tools, which are incorporated into SAIC's IHSS to tailor the system for hydrographic use, and the preliminary results of the first survey are described.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SAIC conducted hydrographic surveys in April through September, 1995, in support of the first multibeam and side-scan work done under contract for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Nautical Charting Branch Office of Coast Survey. These surveys were run using SAIC's Integrated Hydrographic Survey System (IHSS) in conjunction with a Reson SeaBat multibeam sonar and a Klein side-scan sonar. The surveys were done in Long Island Sound and Martha's Vineyard in water depths of 5.5 to 60 m. Contract requirements include proof of 100 per cent multibeam coverage and 200 per cent side-scan coverage; data meeting International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) standards (1/spl times/IHO) to a swath width of 45/spl deg/ and twice MO standard (2/spl times/IHO) at greater usable widths; no across-track multibeam footprints of greater than 3 m; no multibeam gaps of greater than 3 m/spl times/3 m; and the ability to detect contacts of 1m/sup 3/ in water depths less than 20 m, 2 m on each side in 20-30 m depths, and those with heights of 1% of water depth in greater than 30 m of water. This paper discusses selection, configuration, and calibration of the multibeam sonar, related sensors, and the IHSS in order to meet the exacting MO and NOAA standards. In order to use a multibeam sonar for modern hydrographic surveys, a number of issues (including multibeam accuracy, coverage, application of correctors, data volume and throughput, and contact identification) must be addressed. The real-time and processing tools, which are incorporated into SAIC's IHSS to tailor the system for hydrographic use, and the preliminary results of the first survey are described.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SAIC conducted hydrographic surveys in April through September, 1995, in support of the first multibeam and side-scan work done under contract for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Nautical Charting Branch Office of Coast Survey. These surveys were run using SAIC's Integrated Hydrographic Survey System (IHSS) in conjunction with a Reson SeaBat multibeam sonar and a Klein side-scan sonar. The surveys were done in Long Island Sound and Martha's Vineyard in water depths of 5.5 to 60 m. Contract requirements include proof of 100 per cent multibeam coverage and 200 per cent side-scan coverage; data meeting International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) standards (1/spl times/IHO) to a swath width of 45/spl deg/ and twice MO standard (2/spl times/IHO) at greater usable widths; no across-track multibeam footprints of greater than 3 m; no multibeam gaps of greater than 3 m/spl times/3 m; and the ability to detect contacts of 1m/sup 3/ in water depths less than 20 m, 2 m on each side in 20-30 m depths, and those with heights of 1% of water depth in greater than 30 m of water. This paper discusses selection, configuration, and calibration of the multibeam sonar, related sensors, and the IHSS in order to meet the exacting MO and NOAA standards. In order to use a multibeam sonar for modern hydrographic surveys, a number of issues (including multibeam accuracy, coverage, application of correctors, data volume and throughput, and contact identification) must be addressed. The real-time and processing tools, which are incorporated into SAIC's IHSS to tailor the system for hydrographic use, and the preliminary results of the first survey are described.

Key concepts: Hydrographic survey, Hydrography, Sonar, Side-scan sonar, Bathymetry, Oceanography, Environmental science, Remote sensing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Shallow water multibeam sonar performance, results from a modern hydrographic survey system — Research Paper | ScholarLens