2001American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineRequires access

A Comparison of Myocardial Function after Primary Cardiac and Primary Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest

Takashi Kamohara, Max Harry Weil, Wanchun Tang, Shijie Sun, Hitoshi Yamaguchi, Kada Klouche, Joe Bisera

Open publisher page 58 citations

Abstract

Although myocardial dysfunction after resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation (VF) has been extensively investigated, less is known of the function of the myocardium after asphyxial cardiac arrest. The present experimental study was designed to compare postresuscitation left ventricular (LV) function after cardiac arrest caused by asphyxia with that of cardiac arrest induced by dysrhythmia. Four groups of Sprague-Dawley rats, which included eight animals in each group, were investigated. In the first two groups, cardiac arrest followed asphyxia produced by neuromuscular blockade with and without airway obstruction. In a third group, cardiac arrest was induced by electrical fibrillation of the ventricle. The fourth group represented animals in which the duration of asphyxial cardiac arrest was maintained for a time interval corresponding to that of the VF group. The fourth group received approximately the same number of electrical shocks as the third (VF) group. All animals were successfully resuscitated with precordial compression and mechanical ventilation. Postresuscitation measurements, including cardiac output, LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), rate of pressure rise at LV pressure of 40 mm Hg (LV dP/dt40), and negative LV dP/dt, demonstrated decreased myocardial function in each group. No differences in cardiac function were observed between the animals with primary respiratory arrest whether or not the airway was obstructed. However, disproportionate and consistently greater impairment in myocardial function followed primary cardiac arrest due to VF when compared with equal duration of asphyxial cardiac arrest. We conclude that in this healthy animal model, asphyxial cardiac arrest resulted in significantly lesser impairment of postresuscitation myocardial function when compared with cardiac arrest caused by VF.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although myocardial dysfunction after resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation (VF) has been extensively investigated, less is known of the function of the myocardium after asphyxial cardiac arrest. The present experimental study was designed to compare postresuscitation left ventricular (LV) function after cardiac arrest caused by asphyxia with that of cardiac arrest induced by dysrhythmia. Four groups of Sprague-Dawley rats, which included eight animals in each group, were investigated. In the first two groups, cardiac arrest followed asphyxia produced by neuromuscular blockade with and without airway obstruction. In a third group, cardiac arrest was induced by electrical fibrillation of the ventricle. The fourth group represented animals in which the duration of asphyxial cardiac arrest was maintained for a time interval corresponding to that of the VF group. The fourth group received approximately the same number of electrical shocks as the third (VF) group. All animals were successfully resuscitated with precordial compression and mechanical ventilation. Postresuscitation measurements, including cardiac output, LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), rate of pressure rise at LV pressure of 40 mm Hg (LV dP/dt40), and negative LV dP/dt, demonstrated decreased myocardial function in each group. No differences in cardiac function were observed between the animals with primary respiratory arrest whether or not the airway was obstructed. However, disproportionate and consistently greater impairment in myocardial function followed primary cardiac arrest due to VF when compared with equal duration of asphyxial cardiac arrest. We conclude that in this healthy animal model, asphyxial cardiac arrest resulted in significantly lesser impairment of postresuscitation myocardial function when compared with cardiac arrest caused by VF.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 58 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although myocardial dysfunction after resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation (VF) has been extensively investigated, less is known of the function of the myocardium after asphyxial cardiac arrest. The present experimental study was designed to compare postresuscitation left ventricular (LV) function after cardiac arrest caused by asphyxia with that of cardiac arrest induced by dysrhythmia. Four groups of Sprague-Dawley rats, which included eight animals in each group, were investigated. In the first two groups, cardiac arrest followed asphyxia produced by neuromuscular blockade with and without airway obstruction. In a third group, cardiac arrest was induced by electrical fibrillation of the ventricle. The fourth group represented animals in which the duration of asphyxial cardiac arrest was maintained for a time interval corresponding to that of the VF group. The fourth group received approximately the same number of electrical shocks as the third (VF) group. All animals were successfully resuscitated with precordial compression and mechanical ventilation. Postresuscitation measurements, including cardiac output, LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), rate of pressure rise at LV pressure of 40 mm Hg (LV dP/dt40), and negative LV dP/dt, demonstrated decreased myocardial function in each group. No differences in cardiac function were observed between the animals with primary respiratory arrest whether or not the airway was obstructed. However, disproportionate and consistently greater impairment in myocardial function followed primary cardiac arrest due to VF when compared with equal duration of asphyxial cardiac arrest. We conclude that in this healthy animal model, asphyxial cardiac arrest resulted in significantly lesser impairment of postresuscitation myocardial function when compared with cardiac arrest caused by VF.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ventricular fibrillation, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Preload, Cardiac function curve, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Asphyxia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Myocardial Function after Primary Cardiac and Primary Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest — Research Paper | ScholarLens