2010•World Journal of GastroenterologyOpen access

Staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients with a composite predictive model: A comparative study

Shengdi Wu

Open full text 52 citations

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of 6 noninvasive liver fibrosis models and to identify the most valuable model for the prediction of liver fibrosis stage in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. METHODS: Seventy-eight CHB patients were consecutively enrolled in this study. Liver biopsy was performed and blood serum was obtained at admission. Histological diagnosis was made according to the METAVIR system. Significant fibrosis was defined as stage score > or = 2, severe fibrosis as stage score > or = 3. The diagnostic accuracy of 6 noninvasive liver fibrosis models, including serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB-4, Forn's index, Fibrometer, Hepascore, and Shanghai Liver Fibrosis Group's index (SLFG), was investigated. RESULTS: The APRI, FIB-4 and Forn's index under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for significant fibrosis were 0.71, 0.75 and 0.79, respectively, with a diagnosis accuracy of 67%, 77% and 80%, respectively, and 0.80, 0.87 and 0.86, respectively, under the AUROC for severe fibrosis. The Hepascore, SLFG, and Fibrometer were 0.80, 0.83 and 0.85, respectively under the AUROC for significant fibrosis (P < 0.01). The diagnosis accuracy of Hepascore and SLFG was 86% and 88%, respectively. The Hepascore, SLFG, and Fibrometer were 0.95, 0.93, and 0.94, respectively, under the AUROC for severe fibrosis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The models containing direct serum markers have a better diagnostic value than those not containing direct serum markers.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of 6 noninvasive liver fibrosis models and to identify the most valuable model for the prediction of liver fibrosis stage in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. METHODS: Seventy-eight CHB patients were consecutively enrolled in this study. Liver biopsy was performed and blood serum was obtained at admission. Histological diagnosis was made according to the METAVIR system. Significant fibrosis was defined as stage score > or = 2, severe fibrosis as stage score > or = 3. The diagnostic accuracy of 6 noninvasive liver fibrosis models, including serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB-4, Forn's index, Fibrometer, Hepascore, and Shanghai Liver Fibrosis Group's index (SLFG), was investigated. RESULTS: The APRI, FIB-4 and Forn's index under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for significant fibrosis were 0.71, 0.75 and 0.79, respectively, with a diagnosis accuracy of 67%, 77% and 80%, respectively, and 0.80, 0.87 and 0.86, respectively, under the AUROC for severe fibrosis. The Hepascore, SLFG, and Fibrometer were 0.80, 0.83 and 0.85, respectively under the AUROC for significant fibrosis (P < 0.01). The diagnosis accuracy of Hepascore and SLFG was 86% and 88%, respectively. The Hepascore, SLFG, and Fibrometer were 0.95, 0.93, and 0.94, respectively, under the AUROC for severe fibrosis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The models containing direct serum markers have a better diagnostic value than those not containing direct serum markers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 52 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of 6 noninvasive liver fibrosis models and to identify the most valuable model for the prediction of liver fibrosis stage in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. METHODS: Seventy-eight CHB patients were consecutively enrolled in this study. Liver biopsy was performed and blood serum was obtained at admission. Histological diagnosis was made according to the METAVIR system. Significant fibrosis was defined as stage score > or = 2, severe fibrosis as stage score > or = 3. The diagnostic accuracy of 6 noninvasive liver fibrosis models, including serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB-4, Forn's index, Fibrometer, Hepascore, and Shanghai Liver Fibrosis Group's index (SLFG), was investigated. RESULTS: The APRI, FIB-4 and Forn's index under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for significant fibrosis were 0.71, 0.75 and 0.79, respectively, with a diagnosis accuracy of 67%, 77% and 80%, respectively, and 0.80, 0.87 and 0.86, respectively, under the AUROC for severe fibrosis. The Hepascore, SLFG, and Fibrometer were 0.80, 0.83 and 0.85, respectively under the AUROC for significant fibrosis (P < 0.01). The diagnosis accuracy of Hepascore and SLFG was 86% and 88%, respectively. The Hepascore, SLFG, and Fibrometer were 0.95, 0.93, and 0.94, respectively, under the AUROC for severe fibrosis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The models containing direct serum markers have a better diagnostic value than those not containing direct serum markers.

Key concepts: Medicine, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Fibrosis, Receiver operating characteristic, Liver biopsy, Stage (stratigraphy), Liver fibrosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients with a composite predictive model: A comparative study — Research Paper | ScholarLens