2007Applied Economics LettersRequires access

Rational bubbles in the US stock market? Further evidence from a nonparametric cointegration test

Tsangyao Chang, Chi-Chen Chiu, Chien‐Chung Nieh

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

In this study, we revisit the issue as to the presence of rational bubbles in the US stock market during the 1871 to 2002 period using both the Johansen cointegration and the Bierens 1997 Bierens, HJ. 1997. Nonparametric cointegration analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 77: 379–404. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] nonparametric cointegration tests. The results from the conventional Johansen cointegration test fully support the existence of rational bubbles, whereas those from the Bierens nonparametric cointegration test attest to the absence of rational bubbles. On account of the superiority of the nonparametric method to detect cointegration when the error–correction mechanism is nonlinear, we firmly believe that the results from the nonparametric cointegration test are considerably more reliable than those derived from the conventional Johansen approach.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, we revisit the issue as to the presence of rational bubbles in the US stock market during the 1871 to 2002 period using both the Johansen cointegration and the Bierens 1997 Bierens, HJ. 1997. Nonparametric cointegration analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 77: 379–404. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] nonparametric cointegration tests. The results from the conventional Johansen cointegration test fully support the existence of rational bubbles, whereas those from the Bierens nonparametric cointegration test attest to the absence of rational bubbles. On account of the superiority of the nonparametric method to detect cointegration when the error–correction mechanism is nonlinear, we firmly believe that the results from the nonparametric cointegration test are considerably more reliable than those derived from the conventional Johansen approach.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, we revisit the issue as to the presence of rational bubbles in the US stock market during the 1871 to 2002 period using both the Johansen cointegration and the Bierens 1997 Bierens, HJ. 1997. Nonparametric cointegration analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 77: 379–404. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] nonparametric cointegration tests. The results from the conventional Johansen cointegration test fully support the existence of rational bubbles, whereas those from the Bierens nonparametric cointegration test attest to the absence of rational bubbles. On account of the superiority of the nonparametric method to detect cointegration when the error–correction mechanism is nonlinear, we firmly believe that the results from the nonparametric cointegration test are considerably more reliable than those derived from the conventional Johansen approach.

Key concepts: Cointegration, Nonparametric statistics, Econometrics, Economics, Rational expectations, Johansen test, Stock market, Error correction model

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rational bubbles in the US stock market? Further evidence from a nonparametric cointegration test — Research Paper | ScholarLens