1996Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresRequires access

The influence of 10.7‐cm solar‐flux variations on midlatitude daytime ionospheric disturbance conditions

G. G. Bowman

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

For midlatitude regions, routinely recorded ionograms have been used to investigate whether or not the occurrence levels of (1) daytime first‐hop distortions, (2) daytime second‐hop spread, and (3) nighttime spread F are influenced by 10.7‐cm solar‐flux changes, because of associated upper atmosphere neutral‐particle density (UA‐NPD) changes. Recordings for a 5‐year period (1979–1983) were used. It was found that generally speaking, occurrence levels of these parameters were lower for high solar‐flux values and higher for low solar‐flux values as variations occurred from day to day. These are the results expected if the UA‐NPD changes have an influence on the wave amplitudes of the medium‐scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (MS‐TIDs) thought to be responsible for the recording of these parameters. This association was particularly well defined for the occurrence of the daytime second‐hop spread. It is suggested that non linear effects of the atmospheric gravity waves (AGWs) responsible for the MS‐TIDs may be responsible for generating the daytime small‐scale structures, which experimental results indicate are the ionospheric structures responsible for the second‐hop spread. These structures may possibly be field aligned.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For midlatitude regions, routinely recorded ionograms have been used to investigate whether or not the occurrence levels of (1) daytime first‐hop distortions, (2) daytime second‐hop spread, and (3) nighttime spread F are influenced by 10.7‐cm solar‐flux changes, because of associated upper atmosphere neutral‐particle density (UA‐NPD) changes. Recordings for a 5‐year period (1979–1983) were used. It was found that generally speaking, occurrence levels of these parameters were lower for high solar‐flux values and higher for low solar‐flux values as variations occurred from day to day. These are the results expected if the UA‐NPD changes have an influence on the wave amplitudes of the medium‐scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (MS‐TIDs) thought to be responsible for the recording of these parameters. This association was particularly well defined for the occurrence of the daytime second‐hop spread. It is suggested that non linear effects of the atmospheric gravity waves (AGWs) responsible for the MS‐TIDs may be responsible for generating the daytime small‐scale structures, which experimental results indicate are the ionospheric structures responsible for the second‐hop spread. These structures may possibly be field aligned.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For midlatitude regions, routinely recorded ionograms have been used to investigate whether or not the occurrence levels of (1) daytime first‐hop distortions, (2) daytime second‐hop spread, and (3) nighttime spread F are influenced by 10.7‐cm solar‐flux changes, because of associated upper atmosphere neutral‐particle density (UA‐NPD) changes. Recordings for a 5‐year period (1979–1983) were used. It was found that generally speaking, occurrence levels of these parameters were lower for high solar‐flux values and higher for low solar‐flux values as variations occurred from day to day. These are the results expected if the UA‐NPD changes have an influence on the wave amplitudes of the medium‐scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (MS‐TIDs) thought to be responsible for the recording of these parameters. This association was particularly well defined for the occurrence of the daytime second‐hop spread. It is suggested that non linear effects of the atmospheric gravity waves (AGWs) responsible for the MS‐TIDs may be responsible for generating the daytime small‐scale structures, which experimental results indicate are the ionospheric structures responsible for the second‐hop spread. These structures may possibly be field aligned.

Key concepts: Daytime, Middle latitudes, Ionosphere, Atmospheric sciences, Environmental science, F region, Flux (metallurgy), Amplitude

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The influence of 10.7‐cm solar‐flux variations on midlatitude daytime ionospheric disturbance conditions — Research Paper | ScholarLens