1989International Journal of Radiation BiologyRequires access

The Picture Has Changed in the 1980s

G. Gordon Steel, Trevor J. McMillan, John H. Peacock

Open publisher page 74 citations

Abstract

Substantial developments have been made during the 1980s in the radiobiology of human tumours, in particular in studies of the radiosensitivity of human tumour cells. It is now clear that tumour cells differ considerably in radiosensitivity, to an extent that by itself is capable of explaining the clinical response of tumours to radiotherapy. There also is evidence that the radiosensitivity of human tumour cell lines to low radiation doses correlates with clinical experience. Irradiation at low dose rate amplifies the differences between cell lines. In conjunction with mathematical modelling, a study of the dose-rate effect also allows a distinction to be drawn between repairable and non-repairable damage. The differences seen between cell lines at low acute doses or low dose rates are associated with the non-repairable component. The most radiosensitive cell lines have a steep component of non-repairable damage and they give the impression of being recovery-deficient; this may, however, be incorrect for when evaluated at constant dose levels recovery is found to increase with increasing radiosensitivity. This leads to the view that recovery from radiation damage may reflect the amount of recoverable damage inflicted rather than the 'capacity' of the cells to recover.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Substantial developments have been made during the 1980s in the radiobiology of human tumours, in particular in studies of the radiosensitivity of human tumour cells. It is now clear that tumour cells differ considerably in radiosensitivity, to an extent that by itself is capable of explaining the clinical response of tumours to radiotherapy. There also is evidence that the radiosensitivity of human tumour cell lines to low radiation doses correlates with clinical experience. Irradiation at low dose rate amplifies the differences between cell lines. In conjunction with mathematical modelling, a study of the dose-rate effect also allows a distinction to be drawn between repairable and non-repairable damage. The differences seen between cell lines at low acute doses or low dose rates are associated with the non-repairable component. The most radiosensitive cell lines have a steep component of non-repairable damage and they give the impression of being recovery-deficient; this may, however, be incorrect for when evaluated at constant dose levels recovery is found to increase with increasing radiosensitivity. This leads to the view that recovery from radiation damage may reflect the amount of recoverable damage inflicted rather than the 'capacity' of the cells to recover.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 74 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Substantial developments have been made during the 1980s in the radiobiology of human tumours, in particular in studies of the radiosensitivity of human tumour cells. It is now clear that tumour cells differ considerably in radiosensitivity, to an extent that by itself is capable of explaining the clinical response of tumours to radiotherapy. There also is evidence that the radiosensitivity of human tumour cell lines to low radiation doses correlates with clinical experience. Irradiation at low dose rate amplifies the differences between cell lines. In conjunction with mathematical modelling, a study of the dose-rate effect also allows a distinction to be drawn between repairable and non-repairable damage. The differences seen between cell lines at low acute doses or low dose rates are associated with the non-repairable component. The most radiosensitive cell lines have a steep component of non-repairable damage and they give the impression of being recovery-deficient; this may, however, be incorrect for when evaluated at constant dose levels recovery is found to increase with increasing radiosensitivity. This leads to the view that recovery from radiation damage may reflect the amount of recoverable damage inflicted rather than the 'capacity' of the cells to recover.

Key concepts: Radiosensitivity, Radiobiology, Dose rate, Radiation damage, Cell culture, Irradiation, Biology, Cell

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Picture Has Changed in the 1980s — Research Paper | ScholarLens