Comparison of high speed voltage-scaled conventional and adiabatic circuits
David J. Frank
Abstract
David J. Frank
Abstract
The power versus frequency performance of a micropipelined conventional CMOS logic family is compared with that of three similarly pipelined energy-recovering logic families. Using a circuit simulator, the supplies and operating voltages of each family are optimized for minimum power consumption at each frequency. One of the energy-recovering logic families is shown to be capable of substantially lower dissipation than the conventional case, one is comparable, and one is worse.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The power versus frequency performance of a micropipelined conventional CMOS logic family is compared with that of three similarly pipelined energy-recovering logic families. Using a circuit simulator, the supplies and operating voltages of each family are optimized for minimum power consumption at each frequency. One of the energy-recovering logic families is shown to be capable of substantially lower dissipation than the conventional case, one is comparable, and one is worse.
Key concepts: Adiabatic circuit, Pull-up resistor, Dissipation, Logic family, Logic gate, Logic level, Pass transistor logic, Voltage