2008•PubMedRequires access

Restenosis is not associated with stent length in a pig model of coronary stent implantation.

Michael Koutouzis, Apostolos E. Papalois, Stamatis Kyrzopoulos, Paraskevi Dafnomili, Zenon S. Kyriakides

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine if stent length is by itself a risk factor for intimal proliferation and restenosis. Long lesions represent an independent risk factor for restenosis after coronary stent implantation. A longer stented segment might result in a higher probability of restenosis. METHODS: Twenty-two 7-month-old male farm pigs underwent implantation of two steel stents, one short (8 mm length) and one long (16 mm length), in the right coronary artery. The pigs were sacrificed 28 days after stent implantation and histomorphometric analysis of the coronary arteries was performed for neointimal area proliferation and area stenosis evaluation. RESULTS: Seventeen short stents and 19 long stents were finally implanted. There were no differences in neointimal proliferation (1.84 +/- 0.64 mm2 vs. 1.81 +/- 0.94 mm2, p = 0.84), area stenosis (40 +/- 9% vs. 41 +/- 19%, p = 0.86) and lumen area (2.96 +/- 1.30 mm2 vs. 2.51 +/- +/- 1.18 mm2, p = 0.21) between the short stent group and the long stent group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that stent length by itself does not influence restenosis extent in the porcine model.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine if stent length is by itself a risk factor for intimal proliferation and restenosis. Long lesions represent an independent risk factor for restenosis after coronary stent implantation. A longer stented segment might result in a higher probability of restenosis. METHODS: Twenty-two 7-month-old male farm pigs underwent implantation of two steel stents, one short (8 mm length) and one long (16 mm length), in the right coronary artery. The pigs were sacrificed 28 days after stent implantation and histomorphometric analysis of the coronary arteries was performed for neointimal area proliferation and area stenosis evaluation. RESULTS: Seventeen short stents and 19 long stents were finally implanted. There were no differences in neointimal proliferation (1.84 +/- 0.64 mm2 vs. 1.81 +/- 0.94 mm2, p = 0.84), area stenosis (40 +/- 9% vs. 41 +/- 19%, p = 0.86) and lumen area (2.96 +/- 1.30 mm2 vs. 2.51 +/- +/- 1.18 mm2, p = 0.21) between the short stent group and the long stent group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that stent length by itself does not influence restenosis extent in the porcine model.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine if stent length is by itself a risk factor for intimal proliferation and restenosis. Long lesions represent an independent risk factor for restenosis after coronary stent implantation. A longer stented segment might result in a higher probability of restenosis. METHODS: Twenty-two 7-month-old male farm pigs underwent implantation of two steel stents, one short (8 mm length) and one long (16 mm length), in the right coronary artery. The pigs were sacrificed 28 days after stent implantation and histomorphometric analysis of the coronary arteries was performed for neointimal area proliferation and area stenosis evaluation. RESULTS: Seventeen short stents and 19 long stents were finally implanted. There were no differences in neointimal proliferation (1.84 +/- 0.64 mm2 vs. 1.81 +/- 0.94 mm2, p = 0.84), area stenosis (40 +/- 9% vs. 41 +/- 19%, p = 0.86) and lumen area (2.96 +/- 1.30 mm2 vs. 2.51 +/- +/- 1.18 mm2, p = 0.21) between the short stent group and the long stent group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that stent length by itself does not influence restenosis extent in the porcine model.

Key concepts: Restenosis, Medicine, Stent, Cardiology, Lumen (anatomy), Stenosis, Internal medicine, Coronary arteries

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Restenosis is not associated with stent length in a pig model of coronary stent implantation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens