Why Here? Scholarly Locations for American Indian Studies
Jean M. O’Brien
Abstract
Jean M. O’Brien
Abstract
This article takes up the problematic relationship between American Indian studies and American studies from the perspective of graduate training and disciplinary boundaries. It argues that while American studies potentially offers an ideal scholarly location for both graduate training and as a national organization (as it does for ethnic studies more broadly), AIS has not embraced, nor been embraced by, the discipline or the organization in ways that it could be. It closes by offering some possible explanations for the disconnect between AIS and American studies vis a vis ethnic studies more generally.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article takes up the problematic relationship between American Indian studies and American studies from the perspective of graduate training and disciplinary boundaries. It argues that while American studies potentially offers an ideal scholarly location for both graduate training and as a national organization (as it does for ethnic studies more broadly), AIS has not embraced, nor been embraced by, the discipline or the organization in ways that it could be. It closes by offering some possible explanations for the disconnect between AIS and American studies vis a vis ethnic studies more generally.
Key concepts: Discipline, Ethnic group, Perspective (graphical), Latino studies, American studies, Ethnic studies, Native American studies, Sociology