1984Journal of Social IssuesRequires access

Social Support: Methodological Issues in Design and Measurement

Charlene E. Depner, Elaine Wethington, Berit Ingersoll‐Dayton

Open publisher page 57 citations

Abstract

Despite plentiful evidence of a link between social support and adaptation to stress, we still know virtually nothing about why this connection exists. This paper is designed to help the researcher plan a study that offers the optimal test of any given explanation. We assume that the research is founded on a conceptual model of the association between stress, support, and strain. The specificity of such a model will depend upon what has been established from existing knowledge. The paper focuses on key issues in measurement, design, and analysis. A fundamental problem in measurement of social support is how to select from a host of possible strategies. The measurement section introduces important considerations that should govern that choice. The design section alerts the reader to sources of bias that commonly constrain the inferences that can be drawn from social support research. It also addresses the thorny problem of timing measurement to capture a process that transpires over time. The analysis section illustrates how structural equations can be used to model specific social support effects and discusses the circumstances that would make inclusion of additional variables advisable. Finally, we consider the limitations of relying exclusively on quantitative data and illustrate ways in which qualitative research can be used to develop unique information about the role of social support in circumventing the effects of stress.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Despite plentiful evidence of a link between social support and adaptation to stress, we still know virtually nothing about why this connection exists. This paper is designed to help the researcher plan a study that offers the optimal test of any given explanation. We assume that the research is founded on a conceptual model of the association between stress, support, and strain. The specificity of such a model will depend upon what has been established from existing knowledge. The paper focuses on key issues in measurement, design, and analysis. A fundamental problem in measurement of social support is how to select from a host of possible strategies. The measurement section introduces important considerations that should govern that choice. The design section alerts the reader to sources of bias that commonly constrain the inferences that can be drawn from social support research. It also addresses the thorny problem of timing measurement to capture a process that transpires over time. The analysis section illustrates how structural equations can be used to model specific social support effects and discusses the circumstances that would make inclusion of additional variables advisable. Finally, we consider the limitations of relying exclusively on quantitative data and illustrate ways in which qualitative research can be used to develop unique information about the role of social support in circumventing the effects of stress.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Despite plentiful evidence of a link between social support and adaptation to stress, we still know virtually nothing about why this connection exists. This paper is designed to help the researcher plan a study that offers the optimal test of any given explanation. We assume that the research is founded on a conceptual model of the association between stress, support, and strain. The specificity of such a model will depend upon what has been established from existing knowledge. The paper focuses on key issues in measurement, design, and analysis. A fundamental problem in measurement of social support is how to select from a host of possible strategies. The measurement section introduces important considerations that should govern that choice. The design section alerts the reader to sources of bias that commonly constrain the inferences that can be drawn from social support research. It also addresses the thorny problem of timing measurement to capture a process that transpires over time. The analysis section illustrates how structural equations can be used to model specific social support effects and discusses the circumstances that would make inclusion of additional variables advisable. Finally, we consider the limitations of relying exclusively on quantitative data and illustrate ways in which qualitative research can be used to develop unique information about the role of social support in circumventing the effects of stress.

Key concepts: Process (computing), Computer science, Plan (archaeology), Key (lock), Data science, Adaptation (eye), Section (typography), Management science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Social Support: Methodological Issues in Design and Measurement — Research Paper | ScholarLens