Briefing: Statutory adjudication for construction disputes: an overview
Adrian Chan
Abstract
Adrian Chan
Abstract
Following the success of the introduction of security of payment legislation in the United Kingdom, there has been rapid growth globally in the enactment of similar legislation to address the vexed issues of late payment and cash-flow in the construction industry. This article provides an overview of the intended purpose of security of payment legislation and compares the differences between jurisdictions. Particular attention is drawn to the ‘Statutory Adjudication’ regime, and its attempts to preserve cash-flow during a project by resolving payment disputes in an expeditious and provisional manner.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Following the success of the introduction of security of payment legislation in the United Kingdom, there has been rapid growth globally in the enactment of similar legislation to address the vexed issues of late payment and cash-flow in the construction industry. This article provides an overview of the intended purpose of security of payment legislation and compares the differences between jurisdictions. Particular attention is drawn to the ‘Statutory Adjudication’ regime, and its attempts to preserve cash-flow during a project by resolving payment disputes in an expeditious and provisional manner.
Key concepts: Legislation, Adjudication, Statutory law, Payment, Business, Statutory interpretation, Law, Political science