1999Journal of International Medical ResearchRequires access

Zolpidem, a Valuable Alternative to Benzodiazepine Hypnotics for Chronic Insomnia?

A Declebck, Marcel G. Smits

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Sleep quality and anxiety levels were examined using questionnaires and polysomnographic recordings in 22 chronic insomnia patients who regularly used benzodiazepines to treat their sleeping problems. After abruptly discontinuing their benzodiazepine medication, patients were randomly allocated to receive either a placebo or zolpidem 10 mg for 1 week, after which they entered an open extension phase, receiving zolpidem 10 mg for 3 weeks. Subjectively, sleep quality was considered mediocre during the use of a benzodiazepine hypnotic. One week after the discontinuation, an increase in sleep latency was observed in the placebo group, whereas zolpidem induced a significant decrease in sleep latency. Deterioration of other sleep variables (probably rebound) was not suppressed by zolpidem. An explanation for this could be the selective pharmacological profile of zolpidem. Polysomnographic differences between placebo and benzodiazepine and between placebo and zolpidem were not reflected by the subjective data on sleep and anxiety. Changes of sleep structure caused by hypnotics seem not always to be felt as such by patients. After 3-4 weeks of zolpidem treatment, the percentage of non-rapid eye movement-4 sleep increased significantly, corresponding with a significant subjective improvement of sleep quality. This indicates that zolpidem may restore physiological sleep.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sleep quality and anxiety levels were examined using questionnaires and polysomnographic recordings in 22 chronic insomnia patients who regularly used benzodiazepines to treat their sleeping problems. After abruptly discontinuing their benzodiazepine medication, patients were randomly allocated to receive either a placebo or zolpidem 10 mg for 1 week, after which they entered an open extension phase, receiving zolpidem 10 mg for 3 weeks. Subjectively, sleep quality was considered mediocre during the use of a benzodiazepine hypnotic. One week after the discontinuation, an increase in sleep latency was observed in the placebo group, whereas zolpidem induced a significant decrease in sleep latency. Deterioration of other sleep variables (probably rebound) was not suppressed by zolpidem. An explanation for this could be the selective pharmacological profile of zolpidem. Polysomnographic differences between placebo and benzodiazepine and between placebo and zolpidem were not reflected by the subjective data on sleep and anxiety. Changes of sleep structure caused by hypnotics seem not always to be felt as such by patients. After 3-4 weeks of zolpidem treatment, the percentage of non-rapid eye movement-4 sleep increased significantly, corresponding with a significant subjective improvement of sleep quality. This indicates that zolpidem may restore physiological sleep.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sleep quality and anxiety levels were examined using questionnaires and polysomnographic recordings in 22 chronic insomnia patients who regularly used benzodiazepines to treat their sleeping problems. After abruptly discontinuing their benzodiazepine medication, patients were randomly allocated to receive either a placebo or zolpidem 10 mg for 1 week, after which they entered an open extension phase, receiving zolpidem 10 mg for 3 weeks. Subjectively, sleep quality was considered mediocre during the use of a benzodiazepine hypnotic. One week after the discontinuation, an increase in sleep latency was observed in the placebo group, whereas zolpidem induced a significant decrease in sleep latency. Deterioration of other sleep variables (probably rebound) was not suppressed by zolpidem. An explanation for this could be the selective pharmacological profile of zolpidem. Polysomnographic differences between placebo and benzodiazepine and between placebo and zolpidem were not reflected by the subjective data on sleep and anxiety. Changes of sleep structure caused by hypnotics seem not always to be felt as such by patients. After 3-4 weeks of zolpidem treatment, the percentage of non-rapid eye movement-4 sleep increased significantly, corresponding with a significant subjective improvement of sleep quality. This indicates that zolpidem may restore physiological sleep.

Key concepts: Zolpidem, Insomnia, Hypnotic, Benzodiazepine, Medicine, Primary Insomnia, Placebo, Sleep onset latency

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Zolpidem, a Valuable Alternative to Benzodiazepine Hypnotics for Chronic Insomnia? — Research Paper | ScholarLens