2002Unpublished venueRequires access

A trace based evaluation of speculative branch decoupling

A.S. Nadkarni, Akhilesh Tyagi

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Branches are one of the main impediments to achieving maximum instruction-level parallelism. Branch prediction along with speculative execution is the main, incumbent methodology to hide branch stalls. Branch decoupled architectures offer an alternate way of reducing branch penalty. This paper presents a combination of the two methodologies, to show that they can coexist and may provide better performance than processors with conventional branch prediction techniques, but equivalent hardware resources. A trace based evaluation is presented, and with three different branch prediction techniques, it is shown that over twelve of the SPEC'95 CPU benchmarks, speculative branch decoupling performs significantly better than branch prediction with speculative execution, in all the cases. Since a trace based approach has its limitations, the study is a limited one, but makes a strong case for further research in this area.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Branches are one of the main impediments to achieving maximum instruction-level parallelism. Branch prediction along with speculative execution is the main, incumbent methodology to hide branch stalls. Branch decoupled architectures offer an alternate way of reducing branch penalty. This paper presents a combination of the two methodologies, to show that they can coexist and may provide better performance than processors with conventional branch prediction techniques, but equivalent hardware resources. A trace based evaluation is presented, and with three different branch prediction techniques, it is shown that over twelve of the SPEC'95 CPU benchmarks, speculative branch decoupling performs significantly better than branch prediction with speculative execution, in all the cases. Since a trace based approach has its limitations, the study is a limited one, but makes a strong case for further research in this area.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Branches are one of the main impediments to achieving maximum instruction-level parallelism. Branch prediction along with speculative execution is the main, incumbent methodology to hide branch stalls. Branch decoupled architectures offer an alternate way of reducing branch penalty. This paper presents a combination of the two methodologies, to show that they can coexist and may provide better performance than processors with conventional branch prediction techniques, but equivalent hardware resources. A trace based evaluation is presented, and with three different branch prediction techniques, it is shown that over twelve of the SPEC'95 CPU benchmarks, speculative branch decoupling performs significantly better than branch prediction with speculative execution, in all the cases. Since a trace based approach has its limitations, the study is a limited one, but makes a strong case for further research in this area.

Key concepts: Branch predictor, Speculative execution, Computer science, Spec#, TRACE (psycholinguistics), Decoupling (probability), Parallel computing, Superscalar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A trace based evaluation of speculative branch decoupling — Research Paper | ScholarLens