1966Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck SurgeryRequires access

Suboccipital-Translabyrinthine Approach for Acoustic Neuroma

William W. Montgomery, Robert G. Ojemann, Alfred D. Weiss

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

THE IMPORTANCE of total removal of an acoustic neuroma has been emphasized by several authors.1-3,6,11,12Recently, in an excellent monograph, House and coworkers4summarized their results of the translabyrinthine exposure for removal of these tumors. This technique is reported to carry a low morbidity and mortality and gives one the best chance of preserving facial nerve function. Our experience, as well as that of others,10has indicated that total removal of large tumors by the translabyrinthine approach may not be practical and exposure may be difficult. When this technique is used, the separation of tumor adherent to the brain stem and exposure of vital arteries and cranial nerves may be compromised; total removal may not be possible. In the suboccipital exposure, on the other hand, it is quite often difficult to preserve the facial nerve and remove the portion of the tumor in the petrous bone.5,11

About this research paper

What this paper is about

THE IMPORTANCE of total removal of an acoustic neuroma has been emphasized by several authors.1-3,6,11,12Recently, in an excellent monograph, House and coworkers4summarized their results of the translabyrinthine exposure for removal of these tumors. This technique is reported to carry a low morbidity and mortality and gives one the best chance of preserving facial nerve function. Our experience, as well as that of others,10has indicated that total removal of large tumors by the translabyrinthine approach may not be practical and exposure may be difficult. When this technique is used, the separation of tumor adherent to the brain stem and exposure of vital arteries and cranial nerves may be compromised; total removal may not be possible. In the suboccipital exposure, on the other hand, it is quite often difficult to preserve the facial nerve and remove the portion of the tumor in the petrous bone.5,11

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

THE IMPORTANCE of total removal of an acoustic neuroma has been emphasized by several authors.1-3,6,11,12Recently, in an excellent monograph, House and coworkers4summarized their results of the translabyrinthine exposure for removal of these tumors. This technique is reported to carry a low morbidity and mortality and gives one the best chance of preserving facial nerve function. Our experience, as well as that of others,10has indicated that total removal of large tumors by the translabyrinthine approach may not be practical and exposure may be difficult. When this technique is used, the separation of tumor adherent to the brain stem and exposure of vital arteries and cranial nerves may be compromised; total removal may not be possible. In the suboccipital exposure, on the other hand, it is quite often difficult to preserve the facial nerve and remove the portion of the tumor in the petrous bone.5,11

Key concepts: Translabyrinthine approach, Acoustic neuroma, Medicine, Facial nerve, Neuroma, Petrous bone, Surgery, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Suboccipital-Translabyrinthine Approach for Acoustic Neuroma — Research Paper | ScholarLens