2006European Journal of AnaesthesiologyRequires access

Cardiac output measurements in off-pump coronary surgery

Gildas Guéret, G. Kiss, Benoît Rossignol, Eric Bezon, J.-P. Wargnier, A. Miossec, Olivier Le Corre, C. C. Arvieux

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to compare continuous cardiac output measurements of the non-invasive cardiac output system (NICO) with the pulmonary artery catheter during off-pump coronary bypass surgery. METHODS: Twenty-two patients enrolled for off-pump coronary surgery received both a pulmonary artery catheter and a non-invasive cardiac output system for measurement of cardiac output. Data were compared by the Bland-Altman method to calculate the degree of agreement and to analyse if a significant difference existed between the two methods of cardiac output measurements. RESULTS: Perioperatively, the non-invasive cardiac output underestimated cardiac output, but postoperatively overestimated it. The limits of agreement were larger during surgery compared to the postoperative period (-3.1; +2.5 vs. -1.4; +2.2 L min(-1)). Perioperatively, cardiac output measured with the pulmonary artery catheter varied from 0.5 to 7.5 L min(-1) (mean 3.6 L min(-1)) and with the non-invasive cardiac output from 0.5 to 8.4 L min(-1) (mean 3.9 L min(-1)). Postoperatively, these were 2.5-7.7 L min(-1) (mean 4.5 L min(-1)) and 2.3-8.4 L min(-1) (mean 4.9 L min(-1)), respectively. CONCLUSION: During off-pump cardiac surgery, the non-invasive cardiac output reliably measures cardiac output and does it more rapidly than a pulmonary artery catheter and may be more useful in order to detect rapid haemodynamic changes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to compare continuous cardiac output measurements of the non-invasive cardiac output system (NICO) with the pulmonary artery catheter during off-pump coronary bypass surgery. METHODS: Twenty-two patients enrolled for off-pump coronary surgery received both a pulmonary artery catheter and a non-invasive cardiac output system for measurement of cardiac output. Data were compared by the Bland-Altman method to calculate the degree of agreement and to analyse if a significant difference existed between the two methods of cardiac output measurements. RESULTS: Perioperatively, the non-invasive cardiac output underestimated cardiac output, but postoperatively overestimated it. The limits of agreement were larger during surgery compared to the postoperative period (-3.1; +2.5 vs. -1.4; +2.2 L min(-1)). Perioperatively, cardiac output measured with the pulmonary artery catheter varied from 0.5 to 7.5 L min(-1) (mean 3.6 L min(-1)) and with the non-invasive cardiac output from 0.5 to 8.4 L min(-1) (mean 3.9 L min(-1)). Postoperatively, these were 2.5-7.7 L min(-1) (mean 4.5 L min(-1)) and 2.3-8.4 L min(-1) (mean 4.9 L min(-1)), respectively. CONCLUSION: During off-pump cardiac surgery, the non-invasive cardiac output reliably measures cardiac output and does it more rapidly than a pulmonary artery catheter and may be more useful in order to detect rapid haemodynamic changes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to compare continuous cardiac output measurements of the non-invasive cardiac output system (NICO) with the pulmonary artery catheter during off-pump coronary bypass surgery. METHODS: Twenty-two patients enrolled for off-pump coronary surgery received both a pulmonary artery catheter and a non-invasive cardiac output system for measurement of cardiac output. Data were compared by the Bland-Altman method to calculate the degree of agreement and to analyse if a significant difference existed between the two methods of cardiac output measurements. RESULTS: Perioperatively, the non-invasive cardiac output underestimated cardiac output, but postoperatively overestimated it. The limits of agreement were larger during surgery compared to the postoperative period (-3.1; +2.5 vs. -1.4; +2.2 L min(-1)). Perioperatively, cardiac output measured with the pulmonary artery catheter varied from 0.5 to 7.5 L min(-1) (mean 3.6 L min(-1)) and with the non-invasive cardiac output from 0.5 to 8.4 L min(-1) (mean 3.9 L min(-1)). Postoperatively, these were 2.5-7.7 L min(-1) (mean 4.5 L min(-1)) and 2.3-8.4 L min(-1) (mean 4.9 L min(-1)), respectively. CONCLUSION: During off-pump cardiac surgery, the non-invasive cardiac output reliably measures cardiac output and does it more rapidly than a pulmonary artery catheter and may be more useful in order to detect rapid haemodynamic changes.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cardiac output, Pulmonary artery catheter, Cardiac surgery, Catheter, Artery, Coronary artery bypass surgery, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cardiac output measurements in off-pump coronary surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens