1992OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Conceptual design study of superconducting magnetic energy storage using high temperature superconductors. Final report

Susan Schoenung, William R. Meier, R.L. Fagaly, M. Heiberger, R. B. Stephens, J.A. Leuer, Roger Guzmán, E.R. Johnson, J. Purcell, L. Creedon, J.R. Hull

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Since the discovery of high critical temperature superconductors (HTS), many predictions have been made for savings in the cost or performance of superconducting technologies for electric utility systems, such as superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES). The higher operating temperature of HTS materials could mean the use of less expensive cryogens, such as liquid nitrogen, higher refrigeration efficiencies, greater reliability, and easier acceptance within the utility community. While all of these developments may occur, the significance of the improvements depends on the application and other characteristics of the system. Also, today`s HTS materials have some negative features, including lower critical current density and greater brittleness, compared to conventional metallic superconductors. A conceptual design for SMES using HTS has been analyzed to determine configuration parameters, refrigeration requirements, and estimated costs of major components. The study covered the energy storage range from 2 to 200 MWh at power levels from 4 to 400 MW. This range includes utility applications from transient and power stabilization to spinning reserve and load leveling. The present assessment has been carried out for cold-supported modular torus and for comparison, a cold-supported modular solenoid. The toroidal configuration was chosen for analysis because it has minimal magnetic field, which couldmore » be an advantage in locating a small unit near a utility or customer load. The comparison shows that for all cases, the solenoid is comparable in price or less expensive. However, the solenoid has a varying external magnetic field which must be accommodated. The modular approach was selected primarily as a way to wind the coil and keep the brittle oxide superconductor under compression at all operating conditions to avoid breakage.« less

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the discovery of high critical temperature superconductors (HTS), many predictions have been made for savings in the cost or performance of superconducting technologies for electric utility systems, such as superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES). The higher operating temperature of HTS materials could mean the use of less expensive cryogens, such as liquid nitrogen, higher refrigeration efficiencies, greater reliability, and easier acceptance within the utility community. While all of these developments may occur, the significance of the improvements depends on the application and other characteristics of the system. Also, today`s HTS materials have some negative features, including lower critical current density and greater brittleness, compared to conventional metallic superconductors. A conceptual design for SMES using HTS has been analyzed to determine configuration parameters, refrigeration requirements, and estimated costs of major components. The study covered the energy storage range from 2 to 200 MWh at power levels from 4 to 400 MW. This range includes utility applications from transient and power stabilization to spinning reserve and load leveling. The present assessment has been carried out for cold-supported modular torus and for comparison, a cold-supported modular solenoid. The toroidal configuration was chosen for analysis because it has minimal magnetic field, which couldmore » be an advantage in locating a small unit near a utility or customer load. The comparison shows that for all cases, the solenoid is comparable in price or less expensive. However, the solenoid has a varying external magnetic field which must be accommodated. The modular approach was selected primarily as a way to wind the coil and keep the brittle oxide superconductor under compression at all operating conditions to avoid breakage.« less

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the discovery of high critical temperature superconductors (HTS), many predictions have been made for savings in the cost or performance of superconducting technologies for electric utility systems, such as superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES). The higher operating temperature of HTS materials could mean the use of less expensive cryogens, such as liquid nitrogen, higher refrigeration efficiencies, greater reliability, and easier acceptance within the utility community. While all of these developments may occur, the significance of the improvements depends on the application and other characteristics of the system. Also, today`s HTS materials have some negative features, including lower critical current density and greater brittleness, compared to conventional metallic superconductors. A conceptual design for SMES using HTS has been analyzed to determine configuration parameters, refrigeration requirements, and estimated costs of major components. The study covered the energy storage range from 2 to 200 MWh at power levels from 4 to 400 MW. This range includes utility applications from transient and power stabilization to spinning reserve and load leveling. The present assessment has been carried out for cold-supported modular torus and for comparison, a cold-supported modular solenoid. The toroidal configuration was chosen for analysis because it has minimal magnetic field, which couldmore » be an advantage in locating a small unit near a utility or customer load. The comparison shows that for all cases, the solenoid is comparable in price or less expensive. However, the solenoid has a varying external magnetic field which must be accommodated. The modular approach was selected primarily as a way to wind the coil and keep the brittle oxide superconductor under compression at all operating conditions to avoid breakage.« less

Key concepts: Superconducting magnetic energy storage, Solenoid, Modular design, Energy storage, Nuclear engineering, Refrigeration, Superconducting magnet, Superconductivity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conceptual design study of superconducting magnetic energy storage using high temperature superconductors. Final report — Research Paper | ScholarLens