Porosity changes in a granite close to quarry faces: quantification and distribution by14C-MMA and Hg porosimetries
L. Guillot, Marja Siitari‐Kauppi, K.-H. Hellmuth, C. Dubois, Michel Rossy, P. Gaviglio
Abstract
L. Guillot, Marja Siitari‐Kauppi, K.-H. Hellmuth, C. Dubois, Michel Rossy, P. Gaviglio
Abstract
The microcrack distribution in a low porous granite exposed to weathering after quarrying was investigated in order to detect its microstructural evolution. Two blocks (A and B) were taken in the same granite body from two quarry faces respectively exposed during a few weeks and twenty years. Porosimetry by injection of carbon-14-methylmethacrylate (14C-MMA) was used for analysing the porous medium. Measurements of optical densities of autoradiographs provided data for the localization and the quantification of porosity. Results are compared with those obtained by mercury porosimetry. Average porosity of sample A was found to be 0.37 ± 0.03% whereas average porosity in sample B reaches 1.07 ± 0.45%. Most of the porosity increase may be explained by the opening of grain boundaries.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The microcrack distribution in a low porous granite exposed to weathering after quarrying was investigated in order to detect its microstructural evolution. Two blocks (A and B) were taken in the same granite body from two quarry faces respectively exposed during a few weeks and twenty years. Porosimetry by injection of carbon-14-methylmethacrylate (14C-MMA) was used for analysing the porous medium. Measurements of optical densities of autoradiographs provided data for the localization and the quantification of porosity. Results are compared with those obtained by mercury porosimetry. Average porosity of sample A was found to be 0.37 ± 0.03% whereas average porosity in sample B reaches 1.07 ± 0.45%. Most of the porosity increase may be explained by the opening of grain boundaries.
Key concepts: Porosity, Porosimetry, Mineralogy, Weathering, Materials science, Geology, Composite material, Porous medium