2000Journal of the American Ceramic SocietyRequires access

X‐ray Computed Tomography and Mercury Porosimetry for Evaluation of Density Evolution and Porosity Distribution

Peizhen Lu, John J. Lannutti, P. Klobes, Klaus Meyer

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

X‐ray computed tomography (CT) and mercury porosimetry were combined to connect density gradients and the distribution of open porosity in a sintered compact. CT clearly showed that open porosity follows the initial distribution of low‐density zones. Mercury porosimetry detected three distinct levels of porosity. Microstructural examination correlated the porosity level with the coordination of (i) two to three or (ii) multiple grains around pores. This combination of techniques provides a novel tool for the study of pore and density‐gradient evolution during sintering.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

X‐ray computed tomography (CT) and mercury porosimetry were combined to connect density gradients and the distribution of open porosity in a sintered compact. CT clearly showed that open porosity follows the initial distribution of low‐density zones. Mercury porosimetry detected three distinct levels of porosity. Microstructural examination correlated the porosity level with the coordination of (i) two to three or (ii) multiple grains around pores. This combination of techniques provides a novel tool for the study of pore and density‐gradient evolution during sintering.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

X‐ray computed tomography (CT) and mercury porosimetry were combined to connect density gradients and the distribution of open porosity in a sintered compact. CT clearly showed that open porosity follows the initial distribution of low‐density zones. Mercury porosimetry detected three distinct levels of porosity. Microstructural examination correlated the porosity level with the coordination of (i) two to three or (ii) multiple grains around pores. This combination of techniques provides a novel tool for the study of pore and density‐gradient evolution during sintering.

Key concepts: Porosimetry, Porosity, Sintering, Materials science, Tomography, Mineralogy, Computed tomography, Bulk density

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
X‐ray Computed Tomography and Mercury Porosimetry for Evaluation of Density Evolution and Porosity Distribution — Research Paper | ScholarLens