X‐ray Computed Tomography and Mercury Porosimetry for Evaluation of Density Evolution and Porosity Distribution
Peizhen Lu, John J. Lannutti, P. Klobes, Klaus Meyer
Abstract
Peizhen Lu, John J. Lannutti, P. Klobes, Klaus Meyer
Abstract
X‐ray computed tomography (CT) and mercury porosimetry were combined to connect density gradients and the distribution of open porosity in a sintered compact. CT clearly showed that open porosity follows the initial distribution of low‐density zones. Mercury porosimetry detected three distinct levels of porosity. Microstructural examination correlated the porosity level with the coordination of (i) two to three or (ii) multiple grains around pores. This combination of techniques provides a novel tool for the study of pore and density‐gradient evolution during sintering.
OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
X‐ray computed tomography (CT) and mercury porosimetry were combined to connect density gradients and the distribution of open porosity in a sintered compact. CT clearly showed that open porosity follows the initial distribution of low‐density zones. Mercury porosimetry detected three distinct levels of porosity. Microstructural examination correlated the porosity level with the coordination of (i) two to three or (ii) multiple grains around pores. This combination of techniques provides a novel tool for the study of pore and density‐gradient evolution during sintering.
Key concepts: Porosimetry, Porosity, Sintering, Materials science, Tomography, Mineralogy, Computed tomography, Bulk density