2010Iris (Roma Tre University)Requires access

Driving simulation for design consistency

Francesco Bella, Giulia D'Agostini

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Drivers’ speeds were recorded on 32 tangent-curve-tangent configurations of four two-lane rural roads implemented in the CRISS (Inter-University Research Center for Road Safety) driving simulator. 147 driving tests were used for the analysis in order to verify if: a) the midpoint of the tangent and the midpoint of the curve are the most appropriate locations for speed data collection to evaluate the speed differential through the subtraction of operating speed on two locations; b) the speed differential obtained by the subtraction of the maximum operating speed on the last 200 m of the tangent and the minimum operating speed on the curve is significantly different from the 85th-percentile of the distribution of maximum speed reduction experienced by each driver. The results were the following. The maximum operating speed on the last 200 m of the tangent (V85max_200) is higher than the operating speed at the midpoint of the tangent. The operating speed in the midpoint of the curve overestimates the minimum operating speed on curve (V85min,c). A relationship between the point along the curve where the minimum operating speed is achieved and the geometric features of the tangent-curve transition was defined. Speed differential obtained using V85max_200 and V85min,c tends to underestimate the amount of speed reduction experienced by the drivers. Predicting models of the maximum operating speed on the last 200 m of the tangent, of the minimum operating speed on curve and of the 85th-percentile of the distribution of maximum speed reduction experienced by each driver were developed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Drivers’ speeds were recorded on 32 tangent-curve-tangent configurations of four two-lane rural roads implemented in the CRISS (Inter-University Research Center for Road Safety) driving simulator. 147 driving tests were used for the analysis in order to verify if: a) the midpoint of the tangent and the midpoint of the curve are the most appropriate locations for speed data collection to evaluate the speed differential through the subtraction of operating speed on two locations; b) the speed differential obtained by the subtraction of the maximum operating speed on the last 200 m of the tangent and the minimum operating speed on the curve is significantly different from the 85th-percentile of the distribution of maximum speed reduction experienced by each driver. The results were the following. The maximum operating speed on the last 200 m of the tangent (V85max_200) is higher than the operating speed at the midpoint of the tangent. The operating speed in the midpoint of the curve overestimates the minimum operating speed on curve (V85min,c). A relationship between the point along the curve where the minimum operating speed is achieved and the geometric features of the tangent-curve transition was defined. Speed differential obtained using V85max_200 and V85min,c tends to underestimate the amount of speed reduction experienced by the drivers. Predicting models of the maximum operating speed on the last 200 m of the tangent, of the minimum operating speed on curve and of the 85th-percentile of the distribution of maximum speed reduction experienced by each driver were developed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Drivers’ speeds were recorded on 32 tangent-curve-tangent configurations of four two-lane rural roads implemented in the CRISS (Inter-University Research Center for Road Safety) driving simulator. 147 driving tests were used for the analysis in order to verify if: a) the midpoint of the tangent and the midpoint of the curve are the most appropriate locations for speed data collection to evaluate the speed differential through the subtraction of operating speed on two locations; b) the speed differential obtained by the subtraction of the maximum operating speed on the last 200 m of the tangent and the minimum operating speed on the curve is significantly different from the 85th-percentile of the distribution of maximum speed reduction experienced by each driver. The results were the following. The maximum operating speed on the last 200 m of the tangent (V85max_200) is higher than the operating speed at the midpoint of the tangent. The operating speed in the midpoint of the curve overestimates the minimum operating speed on curve (V85min,c). A relationship between the point along the curve where the minimum operating speed is achieved and the geometric features of the tangent-curve transition was defined. Speed differential obtained using V85max_200 and V85min,c tends to underestimate the amount of speed reduction experienced by the drivers. Predicting models of the maximum operating speed on the last 200 m of the tangent, of the minimum operating speed on curve and of the 85th-percentile of the distribution of maximum speed reduction experienced by each driver were developed.

Key concepts: Operating speed, Tangent, Midpoint, Percentile, Mathematics, Operating point, Consistency (knowledge bases), Simulation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Driving simulation for design consistency — Research Paper | ScholarLens