2009•Journal of Chromatographic ScienceRequires access

Comparison of Liquid/Liquid and Solid-Phase Extraction for Alkaline Drugs

Matthew P. Juhascik, Abigail Jenkins

Open publisher page 58 citations

Abstract

The extraction of drugs from biological matrices is an essential specimen preparation step in current forensic postmortem laboratories. Traditionally, liquid/liquid extractions (LLE) were developed and employed to screen for the general unknown. However, solid-phase extractions (SPE) are becoming more popular as the availability of columns with suitable stationary phases increased. The purpose of this work was to determine if switching from an existing LLE to SPE was feasible. The limits of detection (LOD) for 122 drugs and metabolites were determined in blood following SPE and compared to previously determined LOD's by LLE, if available. There were 41 drugs that had LOD's in blood established by both methods; LLE had a lower LOD for 8 drugs (19.5%), SPE had a lower LOD for 16 (39%), and the LOD's were comparable in the remaining drugs. Although SPE cartridges were more expensive than LLE, SPE was determined to be a faster technique and doubled the number of specimens that could be extracted by one analyst within a specific timeframe. The SPE method utilized enabled the detection of several drugs not detectable after LLE (most notably, morphine and benzoylecgonine) and allowed the extraction of weakly acidic and neutral drugs with only one extra step.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The extraction of drugs from biological matrices is an essential specimen preparation step in current forensic postmortem laboratories. Traditionally, liquid/liquid extractions (LLE) were developed and employed to screen for the general unknown. However, solid-phase extractions (SPE) are becoming more popular as the availability of columns with suitable stationary phases increased. The purpose of this work was to determine if switching from an existing LLE to SPE was feasible. The limits of detection (LOD) for 122 drugs and metabolites were determined in blood following SPE and compared to previously determined LOD's by LLE, if available. There were 41 drugs that had LOD's in blood established by both methods; LLE had a lower LOD for 8 drugs (19.5%), SPE had a lower LOD for 16 (39%), and the LOD's were comparable in the remaining drugs. Although SPE cartridges were more expensive than LLE, SPE was determined to be a faster technique and doubled the number of specimens that could be extracted by one analyst within a specific timeframe. The SPE method utilized enabled the detection of several drugs not detectable after LLE (most notably, morphine and benzoylecgonine) and allowed the extraction of weakly acidic and neutral drugs with only one extra step.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 58 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The extraction of drugs from biological matrices is an essential specimen preparation step in current forensic postmortem laboratories. Traditionally, liquid/liquid extractions (LLE) were developed and employed to screen for the general unknown. However, solid-phase extractions (SPE) are becoming more popular as the availability of columns with suitable stationary phases increased. The purpose of this work was to determine if switching from an existing LLE to SPE was feasible. The limits of detection (LOD) for 122 drugs and metabolites were determined in blood following SPE and compared to previously determined LOD's by LLE, if available. There were 41 drugs that had LOD's in blood established by both methods; LLE had a lower LOD for 8 drugs (19.5%), SPE had a lower LOD for 16 (39%), and the LOD's were comparable in the remaining drugs. Although SPE cartridges were more expensive than LLE, SPE was determined to be a faster technique and doubled the number of specimens that could be extracted by one analyst within a specific timeframe. The SPE method utilized enabled the detection of several drugs not detectable after LLE (most notably, morphine and benzoylecgonine) and allowed the extraction of weakly acidic and neutral drugs with only one extra step.

Key concepts: Benzoylecgonine, Chromatography, Chemistry, Solid phase extraction, Cartridge, Extraction (chemistry), Detection limit, Liquid–liquid extraction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Liquid/Liquid and Solid-Phase Extraction for Alkaline Drugs — Research Paper | ScholarLens