2004Current Medical Research and OpinionRequires access

Thiazolidinediones: comparison of long-term effects on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors

Charles G. Gegick, Michael D. Altheimer

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term effects on HbA(1c), lipid parameters, body weight, and hepatotoxicity after switching type 2 diabetes patients from troglitazone to either pioglitazone or rosiglitazone. METHODS: Of 125 study candidates from a previous prospective study, 100 patients (51 pioglitazone, 49 rosiglitazone) met criteria for comparing HbA(1c), lipids, body weight, and incidence of hepatotoxicity over 2 successive observation periods (3.1 and 12.6 months). RESULTS: Mean absolute HbA(1c) decreased significantly, 0.53 and 0.27% in the pioglitazone and rosiglitazone groups, respectively, at the 12.6-month observation. Mean triglyceride (TG) decreased in the pioglitazone group at each interval with a cumulative decrease of 26.4% from baseline. In contrast, TG increased in the rosiglitazone patients by 43.3% at 3.1 months and then decreased (but remained above baseline) at 12.6 months. Mean high density lipoprotein (HDL) increased 22.1% with pioglitazone and 13.3% with rosiglitazone. In patients who had a baseline HDL < 35 mg/dL (0.91 mmol/L), pioglitazone treated patients experienced a significant increase at each interval resulting in a 52.6% increase in HDL compared to a 26.9% increase for rosiglitazone patients. Patients in both treatment groups had similar weight increases at each interval and no hepatotoxicity was noted. CONCLUSION: With pioglitazone or rosiglitazone, changes in glycemic control, lipid effects, and body weight appear to continue over time. Pioglitazone treatment resulted in decreased triglyceride levels, while rosiglitazone was associated with an increase in triglyceride levels. HDL increased in both treatment groups, but in patients with a baseline HDL < 35 mg/dL (0.91 mmol/L), pioglitazone improved the HDL to a greater extent than rosiglitazone.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term effects on HbA(1c), lipid parameters, body weight, and hepatotoxicity after switching type 2 diabetes patients from troglitazone to either pioglitazone or rosiglitazone. METHODS: Of 125 study candidates from a previous prospective study, 100 patients (51 pioglitazone, 49 rosiglitazone) met criteria for comparing HbA(1c), lipids, body weight, and incidence of hepatotoxicity over 2 successive observation periods (3.1 and 12.6 months). RESULTS: Mean absolute HbA(1c) decreased significantly, 0.53 and 0.27% in the pioglitazone and rosiglitazone groups, respectively, at the 12.6-month observation. Mean triglyceride (TG) decreased in the pioglitazone group at each interval with a cumulative decrease of 26.4% from baseline. In contrast, TG increased in the rosiglitazone patients by 43.3% at 3.1 months and then decreased (but remained above baseline) at 12.6 months. Mean high density lipoprotein (HDL) increased 22.1% with pioglitazone and 13.3% with rosiglitazone. In patients who had a baseline HDL < 35 mg/dL (0.91 mmol/L), pioglitazone treated patients experienced a significant increase at each interval resulting in a 52.6% increase in HDL compared to a 26.9% increase for rosiglitazone patients. Patients in both treatment groups had similar weight increases at each interval and no hepatotoxicity was noted. CONCLUSION: With pioglitazone or rosiglitazone, changes in glycemic control, lipid effects, and body weight appear to continue over time. Pioglitazone treatment resulted in decreased triglyceride levels, while rosiglitazone was associated with an increase in triglyceride levels. HDL increased in both treatment groups, but in patients with a baseline HDL < 35 mg/dL (0.91 mmol/L), pioglitazone improved the HDL to a greater extent than rosiglitazone.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term effects on HbA(1c), lipid parameters, body weight, and hepatotoxicity after switching type 2 diabetes patients from troglitazone to either pioglitazone or rosiglitazone. METHODS: Of 125 study candidates from a previous prospective study, 100 patients (51 pioglitazone, 49 rosiglitazone) met criteria for comparing HbA(1c), lipids, body weight, and incidence of hepatotoxicity over 2 successive observation periods (3.1 and 12.6 months). RESULTS: Mean absolute HbA(1c) decreased significantly, 0.53 and 0.27% in the pioglitazone and rosiglitazone groups, respectively, at the 12.6-month observation. Mean triglyceride (TG) decreased in the pioglitazone group at each interval with a cumulative decrease of 26.4% from baseline. In contrast, TG increased in the rosiglitazone patients by 43.3% at 3.1 months and then decreased (but remained above baseline) at 12.6 months. Mean high density lipoprotein (HDL) increased 22.1% with pioglitazone and 13.3% with rosiglitazone. In patients who had a baseline HDL < 35 mg/dL (0.91 mmol/L), pioglitazone treated patients experienced a significant increase at each interval resulting in a 52.6% increase in HDL compared to a 26.9% increase for rosiglitazone patients. Patients in both treatment groups had similar weight increases at each interval and no hepatotoxicity was noted. CONCLUSION: With pioglitazone or rosiglitazone, changes in glycemic control, lipid effects, and body weight appear to continue over time. Pioglitazone treatment resulted in decreased triglyceride levels, while rosiglitazone was associated with an increase in triglyceride levels. HDL increased in both treatment groups, but in patients with a baseline HDL < 35 mg/dL (0.91 mmol/L), pioglitazone improved the HDL to a greater extent than rosiglitazone.

Key concepts: Pioglitazone, Rosiglitazone, Medicine, Glycemic, Internal medicine, Triglyceride, Endocrinology, Type 2 diabetes

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Thiazolidinediones: comparison of long-term effects on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors — Research Paper | ScholarLens