1999Transport Research ForumRequires access

PUBLIC TRANSPORT COSTS IN ADELAIDE: ASSESSMENT AND IMPLICATIONS

David Barton Bray

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The paper describes the recent derivation of the total long term cost of providing public transport in Adelaide, and of unit costs for each mode (including individual train lines, the tram line, the O-Bahn, and on-street bus services). Data from a recent revaluation of public transport assets, and recurrent costs in 1997/98, was used in the analysis. The analysis shows that the cost of carrying passengers by train in Adelaide is high. This occurs primarily because of low levels of patronage. By contrast, the cost of carrying passengers by O-Bahn is considerably lower. Moreover, the cost of the O-Bahn is the same as for on-street buses, with the cost of O-Bahn fixed infrastructure offset by lower operating costs. A comparison with similar cost data for 1985/86 shows that the technical efficiency of public transport in Adelaide has improved. However, service efficiency has declined, especially for bus. There appears to be scope for continuing improvement in the technical efficiency of public transport, and for gains in service efficiency. While other factors must necessarily be taken into account, costs cannot be ignored. The analysis suggests that there is a potentially greater role for the use of buses, in particular O-Bahn, in situations where passenger numbers are below the level needed to justify the use of rail services, and where funding is constrained. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD E200461.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper describes the recent derivation of the total long term cost of providing public transport in Adelaide, and of unit costs for each mode (including individual train lines, the tram line, the O-Bahn, and on-street bus services). Data from a recent revaluation of public transport assets, and recurrent costs in 1997/98, was used in the analysis. The analysis shows that the cost of carrying passengers by train in Adelaide is high. This occurs primarily because of low levels of patronage. By contrast, the cost of carrying passengers by O-Bahn is considerably lower. Moreover, the cost of the O-Bahn is the same as for on-street buses, with the cost of O-Bahn fixed infrastructure offset by lower operating costs. A comparison with similar cost data for 1985/86 shows that the technical efficiency of public transport in Adelaide has improved. However, service efficiency has declined, especially for bus. There appears to be scope for continuing improvement in the technical efficiency of public transport, and for gains in service efficiency. While other factors must necessarily be taken into account, costs cannot be ignored. The analysis suggests that there is a potentially greater role for the use of buses, in particular O-Bahn, in situations where passenger numbers are below the level needed to justify the use of rail services, and where funding is constrained. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD E200461.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper describes the recent derivation of the total long term cost of providing public transport in Adelaide, and of unit costs for each mode (including individual train lines, the tram line, the O-Bahn, and on-street bus services). Data from a recent revaluation of public transport assets, and recurrent costs in 1997/98, was used in the analysis. The analysis shows that the cost of carrying passengers by train in Adelaide is high. This occurs primarily because of low levels of patronage. By contrast, the cost of carrying passengers by O-Bahn is considerably lower. Moreover, the cost of the O-Bahn is the same as for on-street buses, with the cost of O-Bahn fixed infrastructure offset by lower operating costs. A comparison with similar cost data for 1985/86 shows that the technical efficiency of public transport in Adelaide has improved. However, service efficiency has declined, especially for bus. There appears to be scope for continuing improvement in the technical efficiency of public transport, and for gains in service efficiency. While other factors must necessarily be taken into account, costs cannot be ignored. The analysis suggests that there is a potentially greater role for the use of buses, in particular O-Bahn, in situations where passenger numbers are below the level needed to justify the use of rail services, and where funding is constrained. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD E200461.

Key concepts: Public transport, Transport engineering, Economic efficiency, Offset (computer science), Service (business), Passenger transport, Cost analysis, Cost efficiency

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PUBLIC TRANSPORT COSTS IN ADELAIDE: ASSESSMENT AND IMPLICATIONS — Research Paper | ScholarLens