1999Journal of Applied Social PsychologyRequires access

The Effects of Leader and Subordinate Characteristics in the Development of Leader–Member Exchange Quality1

Susan Murphy, Ellen A. Ensher

Open publisher page 161 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the contribution of both subordinate and leader characteristics in the development of leader‐member exchange (LMX) quality. Data from 56 subordinate‐superior dyads working at a large West‐coast media company revealed that subordinates high in work self‐efficacy were liked more by their supervisors, perceived to be more similar to their supervisors, experienced more positive LMX quality, and were rated as better performers than subordinates low in self‐efficacy. Previous job experience, was related only to one outcome; supervisor's liking of the subordinate. Subordinates initially low in self‐efficacy benefited from high LMX, as evidenced by increased end‐of‐program self‐efficacy. Perceptions of similarity between supervisor and subordinate were found to be more important to LMX quality than actual demographic similarity. Leader self‐efficacy and optimism predicted subordinates' ratings of LMX quality only for female supervisors. Unexpectedly, leader self‐efficacy and optimism were related to the leaders' own ratings of LMX and subordinate performance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study investigated the contribution of both subordinate and leader characteristics in the development of leader‐member exchange (LMX) quality. Data from 56 subordinate‐superior dyads working at a large West‐coast media company revealed that subordinates high in work self‐efficacy were liked more by their supervisors, perceived to be more similar to their supervisors, experienced more positive LMX quality, and were rated as better performers than subordinates low in self‐efficacy. Previous job experience, was related only to one outcome; supervisor's liking of the subordinate. Subordinates initially low in self‐efficacy benefited from high LMX, as evidenced by increased end‐of‐program self‐efficacy. Perceptions of similarity between supervisor and subordinate were found to be more important to LMX quality than actual demographic similarity. Leader self‐efficacy and optimism predicted subordinates' ratings of LMX quality only for female supervisors. Unexpectedly, leader self‐efficacy and optimism were related to the leaders' own ratings of LMX and subordinate performance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 161 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study investigated the contribution of both subordinate and leader characteristics in the development of leader‐member exchange (LMX) quality. Data from 56 subordinate‐superior dyads working at a large West‐coast media company revealed that subordinates high in work self‐efficacy were liked more by their supervisors, perceived to be more similar to their supervisors, experienced more positive LMX quality, and were rated as better performers than subordinates low in self‐efficacy. Previous job experience, was related only to one outcome; supervisor's liking of the subordinate. Subordinates initially low in self‐efficacy benefited from high LMX, as evidenced by increased end‐of‐program self‐efficacy. Perceptions of similarity between supervisor and subordinate were found to be more important to LMX quality than actual demographic similarity. Leader self‐efficacy and optimism predicted subordinates' ratings of LMX quality only for female supervisors. Unexpectedly, leader self‐efficacy and optimism were related to the leaders' own ratings of LMX and subordinate performance.

Key concepts: Psychology, Social psychology, Optimism, Supervisor, Quality (philosophy), Perception, Similarity (geometry), Self-efficacy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effects of Leader and Subordinate Characteristics in the Development of Leader–Member Exchange Quality1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens