2010•International Journal of Space StructuresRequires access

A Trial for Seismic Fragility Evaluation of a Large Lattice Dome Supported by Buckling Restrained Braces

Shiro Kato, Shoji Nakazawa

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

A trial to evaluate the seismic fragility of a large dome supported by buckling restrained braces is performed and discussed in comparison with a dome supported by ordinary braces of tension-active capability. In order to evaluate the fragility depending on an adopted bracing system, the damage burdened to the dome structure due to earthquakes is calculated and interpreted as total fragility in terms of assumed seismic intensity varying from small to large earthquakes. The procedure for calculating the total fragility utilizes a simple event tree modelling, where the total fragility is counted considering the damage intensity to structural members, non-structural walls and ceilings. Based on a simple calculation, an example is illustrated to see how the buckling restrained braces are effective or not effective as an anti-seismic reinforcement method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A trial to evaluate the seismic fragility of a large dome supported by buckling restrained braces is performed and discussed in comparison with a dome supported by ordinary braces of tension-active capability. In order to evaluate the fragility depending on an adopted bracing system, the damage burdened to the dome structure due to earthquakes is calculated and interpreted as total fragility in terms of assumed seismic intensity varying from small to large earthquakes. The procedure for calculating the total fragility utilizes a simple event tree modelling, where the total fragility is counted considering the damage intensity to structural members, non-structural walls and ceilings. Based on a simple calculation, an example is illustrated to see how the buckling restrained braces are effective or not effective as an anti-seismic reinforcement method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A trial to evaluate the seismic fragility of a large dome supported by buckling restrained braces is performed and discussed in comparison with a dome supported by ordinary braces of tension-active capability. In order to evaluate the fragility depending on an adopted bracing system, the damage burdened to the dome structure due to earthquakes is calculated and interpreted as total fragility in terms of assumed seismic intensity varying from small to large earthquakes. The procedure for calculating the total fragility utilizes a simple event tree modelling, where the total fragility is counted considering the damage intensity to structural members, non-structural walls and ceilings. Based on a simple calculation, an example is illustrated to see how the buckling restrained braces are effective or not effective as an anti-seismic reinforcement method.

Key concepts: Fragility, Structural engineering, Buckling, Bracing, Stiffness, Geology, Dome (geology), Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Trial for Seismic Fragility Evaluation of a Large Lattice Dome Supported by Buckling Restrained Braces — Research Paper | ScholarLens