On the Security of a Unified Countermeasure
Marc Jóye
Abstract
Marc Jóye
Abstract
Implementation attacks are a major threat for cryptographic applications. Recently, Baek and Vasyltsov (ISPEC 2007) proposed a unified countermeasure for protecting elliptic curve implementations against a variety of implementation attacks, including differential power attacks and fault attacks. This paper studies the security of this countermeasure. In particular, it shows that the fault coverage is less than what was anticipated. Further security weaknesses are also pointed out.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Implementation attacks are a major threat for cryptographic applications. Recently, Baek and Vasyltsov (ISPEC 2007) proposed a unified countermeasure for protecting elliptic curve implementations against a variety of implementation attacks, including differential power attacks and fault attacks. This paper studies the security of this countermeasure. In particular, it shows that the fault coverage is less than what was anticipated. Further security weaknesses are also pointed out.
Key concepts: Countermeasure, Computer science, Computer security, Cryptography, Implementation, Power analysis, Side channel attack, Fault (geology)