2008Unpublished venueRequires access

On the Security of a Unified Countermeasure

Marc Jóye

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Implementation attacks are a major threat for cryptographic applications. Recently, Baek and Vasyltsov (ISPEC 2007) proposed a unified countermeasure for protecting elliptic curve implementations against a variety of implementation attacks, including differential power attacks and fault attacks. This paper studies the security of this countermeasure. In particular, it shows that the fault coverage is less than what was anticipated. Further security weaknesses are also pointed out.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Implementation attacks are a major threat for cryptographic applications. Recently, Baek and Vasyltsov (ISPEC 2007) proposed a unified countermeasure for protecting elliptic curve implementations against a variety of implementation attacks, including differential power attacks and fault attacks. This paper studies the security of this countermeasure. In particular, it shows that the fault coverage is less than what was anticipated. Further security weaknesses are also pointed out.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Implementation attacks are a major threat for cryptographic applications. Recently, Baek and Vasyltsov (ISPEC 2007) proposed a unified countermeasure for protecting elliptic curve implementations against a variety of implementation attacks, including differential power attacks and fault attacks. This paper studies the security of this countermeasure. In particular, it shows that the fault coverage is less than what was anticipated. Further security weaknesses are also pointed out.

Key concepts: Countermeasure, Computer science, Computer security, Cryptography, Implementation, Power analysis, Side channel attack, Fault (geology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Security of a Unified Countermeasure — Research Paper | ScholarLens