1999International Area Studies ReviewRequires access

Free Trade, Protectionism and National Interests

Sangho Kim

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the ongoing debates between free trade and protectionism to derive policy implications applicable to the Korean economy. Despite strong acceptance of a strategic trade policy as an positive economics for trade protectionism, economic criticisms oppose the reliability of strategic trade policy as adequate policy tool. This paper surveys the Super 301 as an example of bilateral trade laws which possibly undermine multilateral negotiations of free trade with emphasis on Korean example. This paper provides a recent suggestion to achieve global free trade through a grand bargain.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper examines the ongoing debates between free trade and protectionism to derive policy implications applicable to the Korean economy. Despite strong acceptance of a strategic trade policy as an positive economics for trade protectionism, economic criticisms oppose the reliability of strategic trade policy as adequate policy tool. This paper surveys the Super 301 as an example of bilateral trade laws which possibly undermine multilateral negotiations of free trade with emphasis on Korean example. This paper provides a recent suggestion to achieve global free trade through a grand bargain.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper examines the ongoing debates between free trade and protectionism to derive policy implications applicable to the Korean economy. Despite strong acceptance of a strategic trade policy as an positive economics for trade protectionism, economic criticisms oppose the reliability of strategic trade policy as adequate policy tool. This paper surveys the Super 301 as an example of bilateral trade laws which possibly undermine multilateral negotiations of free trade with emphasis on Korean example. This paper provides a recent suggestion to achieve global free trade through a grand bargain.

Key concepts: Protectionism, Free trade, International trade, Negotiation, Commercial policy, Economics, Multilateral trade negotiations, International economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Free Trade, Protectionism and National Interests — Research Paper | ScholarLens