2000기업경영연구(구 동림경영연구)Requires access

미국의 통상정책과 경상수지 불균형

박태진

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

After World War Ⅱ, the U.S. played an important role in the multilateral free trade system centered on the GATT. The U.S., the world largest market economy, will continue to have a large influence on the direction of the world trade system. U.S. trade policy has evolved from progressively furthering liberlization through the end of the 1960`s to standing against liberlization and bowing to protectionist pressures in the 1970`s and thereafter. The Section 301 approach and regionalism appproach, which have increasingly characterized recent U.S. trade policy, both tend to support interesta of U.S. export industies and perhaps can lead to export protectionism. As a result of these developments, U.S. trade policy as a whole is presently fairly protectionist. U.S. trade policy has become increasingly protectionist and this trend will probably continue into the foreseeable future, A fundamental change in U.S. policy-makers` thinking is indispensable in order for U.S. trade policy to return toward trade liberalization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After World War Ⅱ, the U.S. played an important role in the multilateral free trade system centered on the GATT. The U.S., the world largest market economy, will continue to have a large influence on the direction of the world trade system. U.S. trade policy has evolved from progressively furthering liberlization through the end of the 1960`s to standing against liberlization and bowing to protectionist pressures in the 1970`s and thereafter. The Section 301 approach and regionalism appproach, which have increasingly characterized recent U.S. trade policy, both tend to support interesta of U.S. export industies and perhaps can lead to export protectionism. As a result of these developments, U.S. trade policy as a whole is presently fairly protectionist. U.S. trade policy has become increasingly protectionist and this trend will probably continue into the foreseeable future, A fundamental change in U.S. policy-makers` thinking is indispensable in order for U.S. trade policy to return toward trade liberalization.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After World War Ⅱ, the U.S. played an important role in the multilateral free trade system centered on the GATT. The U.S., the world largest market economy, will continue to have a large influence on the direction of the world trade system. U.S. trade policy has evolved from progressively furthering liberlization through the end of the 1960`s to standing against liberlization and bowing to protectionist pressures in the 1970`s and thereafter. The Section 301 approach and regionalism appproach, which have increasingly characterized recent U.S. trade policy, both tend to support interesta of U.S. export industies and perhaps can lead to export protectionism. As a result of these developments, U.S. trade policy as a whole is presently fairly protectionist. U.S. trade policy has become increasingly protectionist and this trend will probably continue into the foreseeable future, A fundamental change in U.S. policy-makers` thinking is indispensable in order for U.S. trade policy to return toward trade liberalization.

Key concepts: Protectionism, Free trade, Commercial policy, International trade, Economics, International economics, Trade barrier

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
미국의 통상정책과 경상수지 불균형 — Research Paper | ScholarLens