2001•Crop ScienceRequires access

Wheat Grain and Forage Yields are Affected by Planting and Harvest Dates in the Central Great Plains

Drew J. Lyon, David D. Baltensperger, Melicio Siles

Open publisher page 40 citations

Abstract

Although grazing of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a common practice in the southern Great Plains, little is known about the efficacy of wheat as a dual‐purpose crop in the Nebraska Panhandle. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of establishment and harvest times on forage and grain production of wheat cultivars adapted to the region. Six cultivars were planted at four dates (very early, recommended early, recommended late, and very late) in each of 3 yr. Forage samples were taken from a previously nonharvested area late in the fall, at jointing, and at the boot stage. Grain yield at maturity was measured from each forage harvest treatment and from a full‐season unharvested control. In 2 of 3 yr, grain yield was reduced an average of 25% compared with the full‐season check when plants were harvested for forage at the joint stage. No grain was produced when forage was removed at the boot stage. Forage removal during the fall averaged 1300 kg ha−1 dry matter and resulted in insignificant losses in grain yield. While most of the fall growth was too low to the ground for clipping, it could provide high‐value supplemental grazing on account of the high crude protein (310 g kg−1) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (800 g kg−1) levels. Spring grazing in this region is limited to the time prior to jointing if market conditions favor grain production.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although grazing of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a common practice in the southern Great Plains, little is known about the efficacy of wheat as a dual‐purpose crop in the Nebraska Panhandle. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of establishment and harvest times on forage and grain production of wheat cultivars adapted to the region. Six cultivars were planted at four dates (very early, recommended early, recommended late, and very late) in each of 3 yr. Forage samples were taken from a previously nonharvested area late in the fall, at jointing, and at the boot stage. Grain yield at maturity was measured from each forage harvest treatment and from a full‐season unharvested control. In 2 of 3 yr, grain yield was reduced an average of 25% compared with the full‐season check when plants were harvested for forage at the joint stage. No grain was produced when forage was removed at the boot stage. Forage removal during the fall averaged 1300 kg ha−1 dry matter and resulted in insignificant losses in grain yield. While most of the fall growth was too low to the ground for clipping, it could provide high‐value supplemental grazing on account of the high crude protein (310 g kg−1) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (800 g kg−1) levels. Spring grazing in this region is limited to the time prior to jointing if market conditions favor grain production.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although grazing of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a common practice in the southern Great Plains, little is known about the efficacy of wheat as a dual‐purpose crop in the Nebraska Panhandle. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of establishment and harvest times on forage and grain production of wheat cultivars adapted to the region. Six cultivars were planted at four dates (very early, recommended early, recommended late, and very late) in each of 3 yr. Forage samples were taken from a previously nonharvested area late in the fall, at jointing, and at the boot stage. Grain yield at maturity was measured from each forage harvest treatment and from a full‐season unharvested control. In 2 of 3 yr, grain yield was reduced an average of 25% compared with the full‐season check when plants were harvested for forage at the joint stage. No grain was produced when forage was removed at the boot stage. Forage removal during the fall averaged 1300 kg ha−1 dry matter and resulted in insignificant losses in grain yield. While most of the fall growth was too low to the ground for clipping, it could provide high‐value supplemental grazing on account of the high crude protein (310 g kg−1) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (800 g kg−1) levels. Spring grazing in this region is limited to the time prior to jointing if market conditions favor grain production.

Key concepts: Forage, Agronomy, Grazing, Biology, Dry matter, Sowing, Cultivar, Growing season

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source