1983•Journal of neurosurgeryRequires access

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of patients for carotid endarterectomy

Andrew Henry Kaye, John R. Little, Bernadine Bryerton, Michael T. Modic

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Preoperative intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV DSA) was compared with the operative findings in 54 patients who underwent a total of 57 carotid endarterectomies, to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative IV DSA in predicting the lesion found at surgery. Four studies early in the series were technically unsatisfactory, leaving 50 patients with 53 procedures for evaluation. Severe carotid artery stenosis was accurately predicted in all cases. Deep ulceration in the absence of severe carotid stenosis was reliably shown by IV DSA, although it was not reliably demonstrated by either IV DSA or carotid angiography if severe stenosis was also present. As severe carotid stenosis or deep ulceration are the major radiological indications for carotid endarterectomy, the authors have found that technically satisfactory IV DSA is an adequate preoperative imaging technique.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Preoperative intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV DSA) was compared with the operative findings in 54 patients who underwent a total of 57 carotid endarterectomies, to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative IV DSA in predicting the lesion found at surgery. Four studies early in the series were technically unsatisfactory, leaving 50 patients with 53 procedures for evaluation. Severe carotid artery stenosis was accurately predicted in all cases. Deep ulceration in the absence of severe carotid stenosis was reliably shown by IV DSA, although it was not reliably demonstrated by either IV DSA or carotid angiography if severe stenosis was also present. As severe carotid stenosis or deep ulceration are the major radiological indications for carotid endarterectomy, the authors have found that technically satisfactory IV DSA is an adequate preoperative imaging technique.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Preoperative intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV DSA) was compared with the operative findings in 54 patients who underwent a total of 57 carotid endarterectomies, to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative IV DSA in predicting the lesion found at surgery. Four studies early in the series were technically unsatisfactory, leaving 50 patients with 53 procedures for evaluation. Severe carotid artery stenosis was accurately predicted in all cases. Deep ulceration in the absence of severe carotid stenosis was reliably shown by IV DSA, although it was not reliably demonstrated by either IV DSA or carotid angiography if severe stenosis was also present. As severe carotid stenosis or deep ulceration are the major radiological indications for carotid endarterectomy, the authors have found that technically satisfactory IV DSA is an adequate preoperative imaging technique.

Key concepts: Medicine, Carotid endarterectomy, Digital subtraction angiography, Stenosis, Radiology, Angiography, Carotid arteries, Endarterectomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of patients for carotid endarterectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens