1988Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health CareOpen access

Diagnostic Vacuum Aspiration Curettage and Biopsy without Anaesthesia in General Practice

Niels Damsbo

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

A questionnaire study was made of the pain and discomfort from vacuum aspiration (vabra) of the cervix/uterus without anaesthetic treatment, and the desire of medication/hospitalization in case of a repeated operation. Forty-eight women described a medium pain (4.1 on a scale from 0-9), and a medium discomfort (3.5 on a similar scale). Forty-six women were content to have had the operation carried out by their general practitioner, and 44 women declared that they would prefer to have the operation carried out by their general practitioner if it had to be repeated. The women did not express a desire for hospitalization or anaesthesia. The results indicate that examinations carried out by a general practitioner, who is well known to the patient, cause less strain than examinations carried out elsewhere, and that vacuum aspiration is more gentle to the body than conventional curettage.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A questionnaire study was made of the pain and discomfort from vacuum aspiration (vabra) of the cervix/uterus without anaesthetic treatment, and the desire of medication/hospitalization in case of a repeated operation. Forty-eight women described a medium pain (4.1 on a scale from 0-9), and a medium discomfort (3.5 on a similar scale). Forty-six women were content to have had the operation carried out by their general practitioner, and 44 women declared that they would prefer to have the operation carried out by their general practitioner if it had to be repeated. The women did not express a desire for hospitalization or anaesthesia. The results indicate that examinations carried out by a general practitioner, who is well known to the patient, cause less strain than examinations carried out elsewhere, and that vacuum aspiration is more gentle to the body than conventional curettage.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A questionnaire study was made of the pain and discomfort from vacuum aspiration (vabra) of the cervix/uterus without anaesthetic treatment, and the desire of medication/hospitalization in case of a repeated operation. Forty-eight women described a medium pain (4.1 on a scale from 0-9), and a medium discomfort (3.5 on a similar scale). Forty-six women were content to have had the operation carried out by their general practitioner, and 44 women declared that they would prefer to have the operation carried out by their general practitioner if it had to be repeated. The women did not express a desire for hospitalization or anaesthesia. The results indicate that examinations carried out by a general practitioner, who is well known to the patient, cause less strain than examinations carried out elsewhere, and that vacuum aspiration is more gentle to the body than conventional curettage.

Key concepts: Medicine, Vacuum aspiration, Curettage, General anaesthesia, Biopsy, Anesthesia, Surgery, General practice

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostic Vacuum Aspiration Curettage and Biopsy without Anaesthesia in General Practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens