1999Transportation Planning and TechnologyRequires access

Traffic conflict standards for intersections

Tarek Sayed, Sany Zein

Open publisher page 353 citations

Abstract

This paper describes the application of the traffic conflict technique to estimate, traffic safety at intersections. Using data collected from 94 conflict surveys, traffic conflict frequency and severity standards for signalized and unsignalized intersections have been established. These standards allow for the relative comparison of the conflict risk at various intersections. An Intersection Conflict Index (ICI) measure was developed to summarize conflict risk and provide an indication regarding the relative risk of being involved in a conflict at an intersection. In addition, regression analysis was used to develop predictive models which relate the number of traffic conflicts to traffic volume and accidents. The regression analysis results indicate that: (i) the average hourly conflict rate (AHC) and the average hourly severe conflict rate (AHC 4+) correlated reasonably well with traffic volume for both signalized and unsignalized intersections, and (ii) strong relationships between accidents and conflicts were obtained for signalized intersections only. These research efforts are expected to further enhance the usefulness of the traffic conflict technique as a tool to evaluate the safety of intersections. Finally, a case study is presented as an example of the usefulness of traffic conflict analysis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper describes the application of the traffic conflict technique to estimate, traffic safety at intersections. Using data collected from 94 conflict surveys, traffic conflict frequency and severity standards for signalized and unsignalized intersections have been established. These standards allow for the relative comparison of the conflict risk at various intersections. An Intersection Conflict Index (ICI) measure was developed to summarize conflict risk and provide an indication regarding the relative risk of being involved in a conflict at an intersection. In addition, regression analysis was used to develop predictive models which relate the number of traffic conflicts to traffic volume and accidents. The regression analysis results indicate that: (i) the average hourly conflict rate (AHC) and the average hourly severe conflict rate (AHC 4+) correlated reasonably well with traffic volume for both signalized and unsignalized intersections, and (ii) strong relationships between accidents and conflicts were obtained for signalized intersections only. These research efforts are expected to further enhance the usefulness of the traffic conflict technique as a tool to evaluate the safety of intersections. Finally, a case study is presented as an example of the usefulness of traffic conflict analysis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 353 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper describes the application of the traffic conflict technique to estimate, traffic safety at intersections. Using data collected from 94 conflict surveys, traffic conflict frequency and severity standards for signalized and unsignalized intersections have been established. These standards allow for the relative comparison of the conflict risk at various intersections. An Intersection Conflict Index (ICI) measure was developed to summarize conflict risk and provide an indication regarding the relative risk of being involved in a conflict at an intersection. In addition, regression analysis was used to develop predictive models which relate the number of traffic conflicts to traffic volume and accidents. The regression analysis results indicate that: (i) the average hourly conflict rate (AHC) and the average hourly severe conflict rate (AHC 4+) correlated reasonably well with traffic volume for both signalized and unsignalized intersections, and (ii) strong relationships between accidents and conflicts were obtained for signalized intersections only. These research efforts are expected to further enhance the usefulness of the traffic conflict technique as a tool to evaluate the safety of intersections. Finally, a case study is presented as an example of the usefulness of traffic conflict analysis.

Key concepts: Traffic conflict, Intersection (aeronautics), Transport engineering, Traffic volume, Regression analysis, Poison control, Computer science, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Traffic conflict standards for intersections — Research Paper | ScholarLens