The Invariance Problem in Factor Analysis
J. P. Guilford
Abstract
J. P. Guilford
Abstract
The aim was to determine how accurately the varimax and promax methods of rotation of axes would reproduce known factor matrices. Thirteen factor matrices were contrived, varying widely in percentage of univocal tests. It was found that only when all tests are univocal, or nearly so, could one be reasonably confident that an obtained factor matrix faithfully reproduces a contrived matrix. In some analyses, the pictures of factor structures were distorted and a few factors were entirely lost. Implications for empirical factor analyses are pointed out, with some suggested remedies.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The aim was to determine how accurately the varimax and promax methods of rotation of axes would reproduce known factor matrices. Thirteen factor matrices were contrived, varying widely in percentage of univocal tests. It was found that only when all tests are univocal, or nearly so, could one be reasonably confident that an obtained factor matrix faithfully reproduces a contrived matrix. In some analyses, the pictures of factor structures were distorted and a few factors were entirely lost. Implications for empirical factor analyses are pointed out, with some suggested remedies.
Key concepts: Varimax rotation, Factor (programming language), Factor analysis, Matrix (chemical analysis), Rotation (mathematics), Statistics, Mathematics, Psychology