1985Journal of Computer Assisted TomographyRequires access

Gastrografin Versus Dilute Barium for Colonic CT Examination

Donald G. Mitchell, Eythor Bjorgvinsson, Deborah C. terMeulen, Patricia A. Lane, Melvyn Greberman, Arnold C. Friedman

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

Fifty patients receiving oral contrast medium the day of their CT examinations were studied to evaluate colonic opacification. Two groups were given small volumes (20 versus 30 ml) of nondilute diatrizoate meglumine/diatrizoate sodium (Gastrografin) the night prior to examination and were compared with groups receiving no contrast medium (control) or a large volume (600 ml) of dilute barium the night prior to examination. Frequency of total colonic opacification was as follows: 30 ml Gastrografin, 92%; 20 ml Gastrografin, 71%; dilute barium, 46%; and control, 9%. Significant artifact was infrequent in all groups. Administration of small volumes of nondilute Gastrografin is a well tolerated, inexpensive, and effective method for opacifying the colon for CT.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fifty patients receiving oral contrast medium the day of their CT examinations were studied to evaluate colonic opacification. Two groups were given small volumes (20 versus 30 ml) of nondilute diatrizoate meglumine/diatrizoate sodium (Gastrografin) the night prior to examination and were compared with groups receiving no contrast medium (control) or a large volume (600 ml) of dilute barium the night prior to examination. Frequency of total colonic opacification was as follows: 30 ml Gastrografin, 92%; 20 ml Gastrografin, 71%; dilute barium, 46%; and control, 9%. Significant artifact was infrequent in all groups. Administration of small volumes of nondilute Gastrografin is a well tolerated, inexpensive, and effective method for opacifying the colon for CT.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fifty patients receiving oral contrast medium the day of their CT examinations were studied to evaluate colonic opacification. Two groups were given small volumes (20 versus 30 ml) of nondilute diatrizoate meglumine/diatrizoate sodium (Gastrografin) the night prior to examination and were compared with groups receiving no contrast medium (control) or a large volume (600 ml) of dilute barium the night prior to examination. Frequency of total colonic opacification was as follows: 30 ml Gastrografin, 92%; 20 ml Gastrografin, 71%; dilute barium, 46%; and control, 9%. Significant artifact was infrequent in all groups. Administration of small volumes of nondilute Gastrografin is a well tolerated, inexpensive, and effective method for opacifying the colon for CT.

Key concepts: Diatrizoate Meglumine, Medicine, Diatrizoate, Meglumine, Barium, Barium sulfate, Nuclear medicine, Contrast medium

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gastrografin Versus Dilute Barium for Colonic CT Examination — Research Paper | ScholarLens