Biomechanics of Pin and Screw Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures

Using an in vitro cadaveric femoral neck osteotomy model and a paired experimental design, we compared fixation stiffness and yield load for three- and four-pin configurations for both Knowles pins and Asnis screws and for three Asnis screws versus an AO-ASIF sliding hip screw. Repeat measure analyses of variance indicated a significant increase in stiffness (p < 0.05) with the use of three versus four pins; the yield load did not depend significantly on the number of pins. Fixation was significantly stiffer (p < 0.01) and stronger (p = 0.02) for Knowles pins if the osteotomy was oblique rather than transverse to the femoral neck; the opposite was found for Asnis screws. Femoral fixed with hip screws were significantly stiffer (p < 0.01) than the contralateral side fixed with three Asnis screws. No significant difference in yield load was observed, however. Clinically, it appears from these findings that the use of three Asnis screws or three Knowles pins provides modest increases (averaging 4%) in fixation stiffness with no degradation in strength when compared with four screws or pins. Parallel placement of Asnis screws also provides advantages over nonparallel Knowles pins by allowing controlled impaction of the femoral head. While three Asnis screws provide fixation stiffness approximately 40% less than that found with a sliding hip screw, there is no compromise in fixation strength.